T.S v S.D (7389/2023) [2023] ZAWCHC 288 (20 November 2023)

T.S v S.D (7389/2023) [2023] ZAWCHC 288 (20 November 2023)

The Court found that the applicant has been the children's primary caregiver for eight years and has carefully weighed the decision to relocate, keeping the children's best interests at the forefront. The children expressed a clear and informed desire to relocate to Dubai, and the Family Advocate confirmed that their primary attachment is to the applicant. The respondent's contact will not be diminished but rather increased in terms of holiday time, and the applicant has offered to bear the cost of flights to facilitate contact. There is no evidence that the applicant intends to frustrate the respondent's rights. The order of this Court is capable of enforcement in Dubai, and the...

Citation
[2023] ZAWCHC 288
Parties
Applicant: T S; Respondent: S D
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
20 November 2023
Case Number
7389/2023
Procedural Posture
Family Application / Final Judgment
Outcome
Application granted. The applicant is authorised to relocate the children to Dubai. Parental rights and responsibilities are varied as per the new order. Each party to pay their own costs.
Judges
Holderness
Legal Topics
Child Relocation, Parenting Plan Variation, Best Interests of Child, International Enforcement, Parental Rights and Responsibilities
Family and Children Child Relocation Parenting Plan Variation Best Interests of Child International Enforcement Parental Rights and Responsibilities

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 6 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

T S

Applicant

S D

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family Application / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted permission to relocate the minor children to Dubai.
  2. 2 Whether the relocation is in the best interests of the children.
  3. 3 Whether the respondent's parental rights and contact can be adequately protected post-relocation.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the applicant has been the children's primary caregiver for eight years and has carefully weighed the decision to relocate, keeping the children's best interests at the forefront. The children expressed a clear and informed desire to relocate to Dubai, and the Family Advocate confirmed that their primary attachment is to the applicant. The respondent's contact will not be diminished but rather increased in terms of holiday time, and the applicant has offered to bear the cost of flights to facilitate contact. There is no evidence that the applicant intends to frustrate the respondent's rights. The order of this Court is capable of enforcement in Dubai, and the...

Court Disposition

Application granted. The applicant is authorised to relocate the children to Dubai. Parental rights and responsibilities are varied as per the new order. Each party to pay their own costs.

Orders

  • The applicant is authorised to remove the children from South Africa to Dubai for permanent residence by 11 December 2023.
  • The respondent is directed to sign all documentation required to facilitate the children's relocation within three days of request; failing which, the Registrar may sign in his stead.