Tsebe v Absa Trust Limited and Others (18079/2020) [2020] ZAGPPHC 399 (4 August 2020)
- Citation
- [2020] ZAGPPHC 399
- Status
- Judgment
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Panel
- Fabricius
- Case number
- 18079/2020
More details
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Panel
- Fabricius
- Case number
- 18079/2020
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The court found that the applicant, being a major and the sole beneficiary of the trust, had immediate vested rights in the trust fund according to the Trust Deed. There was no evidence of mental incapacity or any other legal impediment preventing the applicant from managing the trust monies. The respondent did not provide substantive opposition and indicated willingness to abide by the court's decision. The court exercised its discretion under section 13 of the Trust Property Control Act and ordered the termination of the trust, allowing the applicant full control over the trust assets.
Court disposition
Application granted; the trust is terminated with immediate effect.
Orders
- The Trust is terminated with immediate effect.
- The trust monies are to be paid into the trust account of the applicant's attorney for his benefit and disposal.
- Each party shall pay its own costs.
02
Material facts
Parties
Koketso Tsebe
Applicant Counsel: K NwailaAbsa Trust Limited
Respondent Counsel: Adv C.B EllisThe Master of the High Court, Pretoria
Respondent03
Procedural history
Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Termination of Trust
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the applicant is entitled to terminate the trust established for his benefit.
- 02
Whether there is any legal impediment to the applicant dealing with the trust monies directly.
- 03
Whether the court should exercise its discretion under section 13 of the Trust Property Control Act to terminate the trust.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The applicant argued that he is a major male and the sole beneficiary of the trust established after his successful claim against the Road Accident Fund. He contended that clause 5.1 of the Trust Deed grants him immediate vested rights in the trust fund. He asserted that there is no evidence of mental incapacity preventing him from managing the trust monies and invoked his constitutional rights to control his property.
- Respondent
- The first respondent, Absa Trust Limited, was appointed as the sole trustee and opposed the application without providing sufficient evidence of the applicant's incapacity. In its heads of argument, the respondent indicated that it would abide by the decision of the court. The second respondent, the Master of the High Court, did not actively oppose the application.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Trust Property Control Act 57 of 1988
A court has discretion to terminate a trust if certain circumstances arise or are present, as provided in section 13 of the Trust Property Control Act 57 of 1988.
- 02
Clause 5.1 of the Trust Deed
A beneficiary with immediate vested rights in the trust fund may apply for termination of the trust if there is no legal impediment to his capacity to manage the funds.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The court found that the applicant, being a major and the sole beneficiary of the trust, had immediate vested rights in the trust fund according to the Trust Deed. There was no evidence of mental incapacity or any other legal impediment preventing the applicant from managing the trust monies. The respondent did not provide substantive opposition and indicated willingness to abide by the court's decision. The court exercised its discretion under section 13 of the Trust Property Control Act and ordered the termination of the trust, allowing the applicant full control over the trust assets.
Obiter and limits
- The diligence of the respondent in managing the applicant's monies was not relevant to the determination of the application.
- The manner in which the applicant chooses to deal with his monies after termination of the trust is not the concern of the respondent.
Court disposition
Application granted; the trust is terminated with immediate effect.
- The Trust is terminated with immediate effect.
- The trust monies are to be paid into the trust account of the applicant's attorney for his benefit and disposal.
- Each party shall pay its own costs.
Source and reliance status
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Judgment
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
(GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA)
CASE NO: 18079/2020
IN THE MATTER BETWEEN:
KOKETSO
TSEBE
Applicant
AND
ABSA
TRUST
LIMITED
First Respondent
THE MASTER OF THE HIGH COURT, PRETORIA
Second Respondent
JUDGMENT
FABRICIUS J
[1] The applicant herein, a major male, seeks an order terminating a trust that was established after he succeeded with a claim for damages against the Road Accident Fund. He was the sole beneficiary of such Trust.
[2] Respondent was appointed as the sole Trustee. It obviously acts through an employee, who need not be joined in these proceedings, contrary to Respondent’s contention.
[3] According to cl.5.1 of the Trust Deed applicant will have immediate vested rights in the trust fund.
[4] It is difficult to discern on which basis Respondent opposed this application. There is no or insufficient evidence that Applicant
cannot deal with the trust monies on the basis of mental incapacity. In Respondents’ heads of argument it is stated that respondent will abide by the decision of the court.
[5] There is no need to deal with collateral issues such as whether or not the Respondent diligently dealt with applicant’s monies to his satisfaction or not.
[6] It is not its concern how applicant now wishes to deal with his monies. According to the provisions of s13 of the Trust Property Control Act 57 of 1988 a court has a discretion to terminate a Trust if certain circumstances arise or are present. I am satisfied that Applicant also has the constitutional rights that he refers to in par 4 of his Replying Affidavit.
[7] The following order is therefore made:
7.1 The Trust is terminated with immediate effect;
7.2 The Trust monies are to be paid into the Trust account of Applicant’s Attorney for his benefit and disposal.
7.3 Each party shall pay its own costs.
H
FABRICIUS
JUDGE
OF THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA
DATE OF HEARING: NO
ORAL HEARING
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 4 AUGUST 2020
FOR THE APPLICANT: K NWAILA
INSTRUCTED BY: NWAILA ATTORNEYS INC
FOR THE RESPONDENT: ADV C.B ELLIS
INSTRUCTED BY: GILDENHUYS MALATJI INC
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.