Tshabalala and Others v Tshabalala and Others (38827/2016) [2019] ZAGPJHC 192 (28 June 2019)
The court found that the applicants could not rely on the purported will of Manana Paulina Tshabalala, as the original was not delivered to the Master and no application was made to declare the copy valid. The evidence established that Manana Paulina Tshabalala lawfully ceded her rights in the property to her son,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2019] ZAGPJHC 192
- Parties
- Applicant: Martha Azlinah Tshabalala; Applicant: Mosa Emily Tshabalala; Applicant: Thandi Emily Tshabalala; Applicant: Sonto Thandiwe Tshabalala; Applicant: Esther Ramanantso; Applicant: Edward Ramanantso; Applicant: Julia Ramanantso; Applicant: Michael Ramanantso; Applicant: Dorothy Nkosingiphile Ramanantso; Applicant: Nompumelelo Thango; Respondent: Dumazile Rachel Tshabalala; Respondent: Dumazile Rachel Tshabalala N.O.; Respondent: The Master of the High Court, Johannesburg; Respondent: The Director-General of the Department of Housing, Gauteng Province; Respondent: The MEC for the Department of Housing, Gauteng Province; Respondent: The Department of Housing; Respondent: The Registrar of Deeds, Johannesburg
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2019
- Case Number
- 38827/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- K E Matojane
- Legal Topics
- Cession of Rights, Title Deed Cancellation, Intestate Succession, Conversion of Rights, Will Validity
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Martha Azlinah Tshabalala
Applicant
Mosa Emily Tshabalala
Applicant
Thandi Emily Tshabalala
Applicant
Sonto Thandiwe Tshabalala
Applicant
Esther Ramanantso
Applicant
Edward Ramanantso
Applicant
Julia Ramanantso
Applicant
Michael Ramanantso
Applicant
Dorothy Nkosingiphile Ramanantso
Applicant
Nompumelelo Thango
Applicant
Dumazile Rachel Tshabalala
Respondent
Dumazile Rachel Tshabalala N.O.
Respondent
The Master of the High Court, Johannesburg
Respondent
The Director-General of the Department of Housing, Gauteng Province
Respondent
The MEC for the Department of Housing, Gauteng Province
Respondent
The Department of Housing
Respondent
The Registrar of Deeds, Johannesburg
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to cancellation of Title Deed Number TL1146/1998 for the property in question.
- 2 Whether the purported will of Manana Paulina Tshabalala is valid and enforceable.
- 3 Whether the late Manana Paulina Tshabalala lawfully ceded her rights in the property to Fana Daniel Tshabalala.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants could not rely on the purported will of Manana Paulina Tshabalala, as the original was not delivered to the Master and no application was made to declare the copy valid. The evidence established that Manana Paulina Tshabalala lawfully ceded her rights in the property to her son, Fana Daniel Tshabalala, through an out-and-out cession, witnessed and stamped by the relevant authority. Once ceded, she was precluded from bequeathing the property in her will. The property was subsequently transferred to the first respondent and her late husband in accordance with the Conversion of Certain Rights into Leasehold or Ownership Act, following an inquiry and...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment