Tshehla v Emfuleni Local Municipality (JS 619/13) [2015] ZALCJHB 7 (21 January 2015)
The Labour Court lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate the applicant's unfair labour practice dispute because such matters must be resolved by arbitration at the bargaining council in terms of the LRA. The respondent's failure to raise the jurisdictional point earlier does not confer jurisdiction on the Court. Regarding the discrimination claim, the applicant failed to exhaust the enforcement procedures under Chapter V of the Employment Equity Act, and the dispute was not properly conciliated by the CCMA as required by section 10 of the EEA. The bargaining council lacked jurisdiction to conciliate the discrimination dispute, and the applicant's direct referral to the Labour Court was...
- Citation
- [2015] ZALCJHB 7
- Parties
- Applicant: Reginald Tshehla; Respondent: Emfuleni Local Municipality
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 21 January 2015
- Case Number
- JS 619/13
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Court Application / Jurisdictional Challenge and Merits
- Outcome
- Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
- Judges
- Molahlehi
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Labour Practice, Unfair Discrimination, Employment Equity Act, Jurisdiction, Conciliation and Arbitration
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Reginald Tshehla
Applicant
Emfuleni Local Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Labour Court Application / Jurisdictional Challenge and Merits
Legal Issues
- 1 Does the Labour Court have jurisdiction to adjudicate the applicant's unfair labour practice claim?
- 2 Is the Labour Court competent to hear the discrimination dispute before exhaustion of enforcement procedures under the Employment Equity Act?
- 3 Should the matter be referred back to the bargaining council or CCMA for arbitration or conciliation?
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Court lacks jurisdiction to adjudicate the applicant's unfair labour practice dispute because such matters must be resolved by arbitration at the bargaining council in terms of the LRA. The respondent's failure to raise the jurisdictional point earlier does not confer jurisdiction on the Court. Regarding the discrimination claim, the applicant failed to exhaust the enforcement procedures under Chapter V of the Employment Equity Act, and the dispute was not properly conciliated by the CCMA as required by section 10 of the EEA. The bargaining council lacked jurisdiction to conciliate the discrimination dispute, and the applicant's direct referral to the Labour Court was...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Orders
- The Court lacks jurisdiction to entertain the applicant’s unfair labour practice and discrimination disputes.
- The applicant’s claim is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment