Tsogo Sun Caledon (Pty) Ltd and Others v Western Cape Gambling and Racing Board and Another (89/2021) [2022] ZASCA 102; 2023 (2) SA 305 (SCA) (24 June 2022)

Tsogo Sun Caledon (Pty) Ltd and Others v Western Cape Gambling and Racing Board and Another (89/2021) [2022] ZASCA 102; 2023 (2) SA 305 (SCA) (24 June 2022)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the Western Cape Gambling and Racing Board failed to comply with the requirements of section 53(2) of the National Gambling Act when it imposed a blanket Level 4 B-BBEE condition on all licensees. The Board did not individually evaluate the commitments and achievements of each appellant, nor did it demonstrate that imposing further or different conditions was necessary to address the matters referred to in the Act. The Board's approach amounted to the unlawful elevation of policy into a binding rule, thereby fettering its discretion and acting ultra vires. The jurisdictional facts for the exercise of the power to impose the impugned conditions were...

Citation
[2022] ZASCA 102
Parties
Appellant: Tsogo Sun Caledon (Pty) Ltd; Appellant: West Coast Leisure (Pty) Ltd; Appellant: Garden Route Casino (Pty) Ltd; Appellant: Vukani Gaming Western Cape (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Western Cape Gambling and Racing Board; Respondent: Chairperson of the Western Cape Gambling and Racing Board
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
24 June 2022
Case Number
89/2021
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Appeal From Western Cape Division of the High Court
Outcome
Appeal upheld; the Board's decisions to impose the Level 4 B-BBEE licence conditions on the appellants were declared unlawful and invalid, reviewed and set aside.
Judges
Petse, Zondi, Gorven, Mabindla-Boqwana, Musi
Legal Topics
Principle of Legality, Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment, Licensing Conditions, Jurisdictional Facts, Review of Administrative Action

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 12 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Tsogo Sun Caledon (Pty) Ltd

Appellant

West Coast Leisure (Pty) Ltd

Appellant

Garden Route Casino (Pty) Ltd

Appellant

Vukani Gaming Western Cape (Pty) Ltd

Appellant

Western Cape Gambling and Racing Board

Respondent

Chairperson of the Western Cape Gambling and Racing Board

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Appeal From Western Cape Division of the High Court

  1. 1 Whether the Western Cape Gambling and Racing Board was empowered to impose a licence condition requiring licensees to maintain a Level 4 B-BBEE certification.
  2. 2 Whether the jurisdictional facts for imposing such licence conditions were satisfied under section 53(2) of the National Gambling Act.
  3. 3 Whether the Board unlawfully applied a blanket industry-wide condition without individual evaluation of licensees.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the Western Cape Gambling and Racing Board failed to comply with the requirements of section 53(2) of the National Gambling Act when it imposed a blanket Level 4 B-BBEE condition on all licensees. The Board did not individually evaluate the commitments and achievements of each appellant, nor did it demonstrate that imposing further or different conditions was necessary to address the matters referred to in the Act. The Board's approach amounted to the unlawful elevation of policy into a binding rule, thereby fettering its discretion and acting ultra vires. The jurisdictional facts for the exercise of the power to impose the impugned conditions were...

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; the Board's decisions to impose the Level 4 B-BBEE licence conditions on the appellants were declared unlawful and invalid, reviewed and set aside.

Orders

  • The appeal is upheld with costs, including costs of two counsel where so employed, to be paid jointly and severally by the respondents.
  • The order of the court a quo is set aside and substituted with a declaration that the Board's decisions to impose the Level 4 B-BBEE licence conditions on the appellants are unlawful and invalid.