Tsogo Sun Caledon (Pty) Ltd and Others v Western Cape Gambling and Racing Board and Another (89/2021) [2022] ZASCA 102; 2023 (2) SA 305 (SCA) (24 June 2022)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the Western Cape Gambling and Racing Board failed to comply with the requirements of section 53(2) of the National Gambling Act when it imposed a blanket Level 4 B-BBEE condition on all licensees. The Board did not individually evaluate the commitments and achievements of each appellant, nor did it demonstrate that imposing further or different conditions was necessary to address the matters referred to in the Act. The Board's approach amounted to the unlawful elevation of policy into a binding rule, thereby fettering its discretion and acting ultra vires. The jurisdictional facts for the exercise of the power to impose the impugned conditions were...
- Citation
- [2022] ZASCA 102
- Parties
- Appellant: Tsogo Sun Caledon (Pty) Ltd; Appellant: West Coast Leisure (Pty) Ltd; Appellant: Garden Route Casino (Pty) Ltd; Appellant: Vukani Gaming Western Cape (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Western Cape Gambling and Racing Board; Respondent: Chairperson of the Western Cape Gambling and Racing Board
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 24 June 2022
- Case Number
- 89/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Appeal From Western Cape Division of the High Court
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; the Board's decisions to impose the Level 4 B-BBEE licence conditions on the appellants were declared unlawful and invalid, reviewed and set aside.
- Judges
- Petse, Zondi, Gorven, Mabindla-Boqwana, Musi
- Legal Topics
- Principle of Legality, Broad Based Black Economic Empowerment, Licensing Conditions, Jurisdictional Facts, Review of Administrative Action
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tsogo Sun Caledon (Pty) Ltd
Appellant
West Coast Leisure (Pty) Ltd
Appellant
Garden Route Casino (Pty) Ltd
Appellant
Vukani Gaming Western Cape (Pty) Ltd
Appellant
Western Cape Gambling and Racing Board
Respondent
Chairperson of the Western Cape Gambling and Racing Board
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Appeal From Western Cape Division of the High Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Western Cape Gambling and Racing Board was empowered to impose a licence condition requiring licensees to maintain a Level 4 B-BBEE certification.
- 2 Whether the jurisdictional facts for imposing such licence conditions were satisfied under section 53(2) of the National Gambling Act.
- 3 Whether the Board unlawfully applied a blanket industry-wide condition without individual evaluation of licensees.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the Western Cape Gambling and Racing Board failed to comply with the requirements of section 53(2) of the National Gambling Act when it imposed a blanket Level 4 B-BBEE condition on all licensees. The Board did not individually evaluate the commitments and achievements of each appellant, nor did it demonstrate that imposing further or different conditions was necessary to address the matters referred to in the Act. The Board's approach amounted to the unlawful elevation of policy into a binding rule, thereby fettering its discretion and acting ultra vires. The jurisdictional facts for the exercise of the power to impose the impugned conditions were...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; the Board's decisions to impose the Level 4 B-BBEE licence conditions on the appellants were declared unlawful and invalid, reviewed and set aside.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld with costs, including costs of two counsel where so employed, to be paid jointly and severally by the respondents.
- The order of the court a quo is set aside and substituted with a declaration that the Board's decisions to impose the Level 4 B-BBEE licence conditions on the appellants are unlawful and invalid.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment