Download PDF

South Africa Judgment

Competition Tribunal

Tsogo Sun Gaming (Pty) Ltd v Millenium Casino Ltd (58/LM/Aug09) [2010] ZACT 10 (4 February 2010)

On this page

Professional case brief

Research organized from the available case record

Source document

01

Holding and result

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction is essentially an internal restructuring within the HCI group, consolidating the indirect shareholding in Tsogo Sun KZN under Tsogo Gaming. Since Tsogo Gaming already indirectly controlled Tsogo Sun KZN prior to the merger, the transaction does not alter the competitive landscape or market structure. There is no overlap in activities that would raise competition concerns, and no public interest issues were identified. Accordingly, the Tribunal concluded that the merger is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market and approved the transaction unconditionally.

Court disposition

Merger approved unconditionally.

Orders

  • The merger between Tsogo Sun Gaming (Pty) Ltd and Millennium Casino Limited is approved unconditionally.

02

Material facts

Parties

Tsogo Sun Gaming (Pty) Ltd

Applicant Counsel: Nortons Inc.

Millennium Casino Limited

Respondent

Amounts and remedies

  • Millennium's Shareholding in Durban Add Venture (%): 74.67
  • Millennium's Shareholding in Adventure World Management (%): 60
  • Adventure World Management's Shareholding in Durban Add Venture (%): 0.39

03

Procedural history

  1. Posture

    Merger Approval / Reasons for Decision

04

Questions and positions

Legal issues

Party arguments

Applicant
The merging parties argued that the transaction is an internal restructuring within the HCI group, consolidating HCI's indirect shareholding in Tsogo Sun KZN under Tsogo Gaming. They submitted that Tsogo Sun KZN is already indirectly controlled by Tsogo Gaming pre-merger, and the transaction will enable optimal management of casino interests through a single entry point.
Respondent
The Competition Commission did not oppose the merger and concurred that the transaction is an internal restructuring with no impact on competition. The Commission confirmed that Tsogo Sun KZN is already controlled by Tsogo Gaming and that no public interest concerns arise.

05

Court’s reasoning

  1. 01

    Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

    A merger that does not result in a change of control or market structure is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition.

  2. 02

    Competition Tribunal precedent

    Internal restructurings within a group of companies generally do not raise competition concerns unless they affect market dynamics.

06

Ratio, limits and disposition

Ratio decidendi

The Tribunal found that the proposed transaction is essentially an internal restructuring within the HCI group, consolidating the indirect shareholding in Tsogo Sun KZN under Tsogo Gaming. Since Tsogo Gaming already indirectly controlled Tsogo Sun KZN prior to the merger, the transaction does not alter the competitive landscape or market structure. There is no overlap in activities that would raise competition concerns, and no public interest issues were identified. Accordingly, the Tribunal concluded that the merger is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market and approved the transaction unconditionally.

Obiter and limits

  • The Tribunal noted that internal restructurings of this nature are generally unlikely to raise competition concerns unless there is a material change in control or market structure.
  • No public interest issues were identified in this transaction, reaffirming the principle that not all mergers require conditions or remedies.

Court disposition

Merger approved unconditionally.

  • The merger between Tsogo Sun Gaming (Pty) Ltd and Millennium Casino Limited is approved unconditionally.

Source and reliance status

Competition Tribunal

This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.

Judgment reading view

Judgment text

The complete available source text.

Source document

Competition Tribunal

Judgment

[2010] ZACT 10

COMPETITION TRIBUNAL OF

SOUTH AFRICA

Case No: 58/LM/Aug09

In the matter between:

Tsogo Sun Gaming (Pty) Ltd Acquiring Firm

And

The Millennium Casino Limited Target Firm

Panel : Y Carrim (Presiding Member)

N Theron (Tribunal Member)

A Wessels (Tribunal Member)

Heard on : 07/10/2009

Order issued on : 07/10/2009

Reasons issued on : 04/02/2010

Reasons for Decision

Approval

On 7 October 2009 the Competition Tribunal (“Tribunal”) unconditionally approved the merger between the above-mentioned

parties. The reasons for approval follow below.

Parties and their activities

The primary acquiring firm is Tsogo Sun Gaming (Pty) Ltd (“Tsogo Gaming”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Tsogo Sun Holdings (Pty) Ltd (“Tsogo Holdings”). Tsogo Investment Holding Company (Pty) Ltd (“Tsogo Investment“) holds 51% of the issued share capital of Tsogo Holdings; SABMiller plc (“SABMiller“) holds the remaining 49%. Tsogo Investment is controlled by Hosken Consolidated Investments Limited (“HCI”), a public company listed on the JSE Limited.

The Tsogo Sun group’s activities relate to casinos (offering gaming, dining, entertainment and conference facilities) and hotels. HCI is an investment holding company; its principal areas of investment involve gaming, hotels and leisure; media and

broadcasting; transport; energy; property and exhibitions; industrial; food and beverage; and clothing and textiles. SABMiller’s interests relate to brewing, bottling and distribution.

The primary target firm is The Millennium Casino Limited (“Millennium”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Johnnic Holdings Limited (“Johnnic”). Johnnic, in turn, is a wholly owned subsidiary of HCI. Millennium has a 74.67% shareholding in Durban Add-Venture Limited (“Durban Add-Venture”) and a 60% shareholding in Adventure World Management (Pty) Ltd (“Adventure World Management“)1. According to the merging parties, Millennium’s only real asset is its indirect2 40% shareholding in Tsogo Sun KZN (Pty) Ltd (“Tsogo Sun KZN”). Tsogo Gaming indirectly holds the remaining 60%, i.e. majority, shareholding in Tsogo Sun KZN and therefore has control of Tsogo Sun KZN, according to the merging parties.

Millennium, Durban Add-Venture and Adventure World Management are purely holding companies and provide no services. Tsogo Sun KZN owns and operates the Suncoast Casino in Durban.

Proposed transaction

In terms of the proposed transaction, Tsogo Gaming intends to acquire the entire issued share capital of Millennium from Johnnic.

Consequently Tsogo Gaming will post merger wholly own Tsogo Sun KZN. The proposed transaction is principally an internal restructuring

within the HCI group of companies which consolidates HCI’s indirect shareholding in Tsogo Sun KZN in Tsogo Gaming.

Rationale for the transaction

According to the merging parties, the proposed transaction will enable the HCI group to manage its casino interests optimally through a single entry point, being Tsogo Investment.

Competition analysis

The only overlap between the activities of the merging parties in any relevant market relates to their joint shareholding in Tsogo Sun KZN. As stated in paragraph 6 above, the proposed transaction is effectively an internal restructuring and Tsogo Sun KZN is already indirectly controlled by Tsogo Gaming premerger. As such, competition is not substantially prevented or lessened in any relevant market as a result of this proposed deal.

CONCLUSION

The Tribunal concludes that the proposed transaction is unlikely to substantially prevent or lessen competition in any relevant market. Furthermore, no public interest concerns arise from this transaction. Therefore, the proposed transaction is approved

unconditionally.

____ 04/02/2010

A Wessels

DATE

Y Carrim and N Theron concurring

Tribunal Researcher: Londiwe Senona

For the merging parties: Nortons Inc.

For the Commission: M Matsimela (Mergers & Acquisitions)

1 Adventure World Management holds 0.39% of the shares in Durban Add-Venture.

2 Through its subsidiary Durban Add-Venture.

3

Source wording is retained. Consult the source document for its original formatting and pagination.

Authorities

Authorities used by the court

Cases, legislation, regulations, and constitutional provisions identified in the available record.

Competition Act, No. 89 of 1998

Legislation

Legislation referenced in the available case record.

Case-aware research

Ask AI about this case

The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.

About this LexChat collection

This page organizes the available case record for research. Verify quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the source document. Corrections can be reported to hello@esheria.ai.

Legal information, not legal advice. Research summaries do not replace the judgment.