Tsotetsi v Mkhwebane and Others (40252/19) [2021] ZAGPJHC 781 (6 December 2021)
The court found that the sale of the property to the respondents was fraudulent, as it was effected by an imposter who unlawfully impersonated the applicant and used forged documents. The respondents admitted the fraudulent nature of the transaction both in correspondence and in their answering affidavit. The applicant was not complicit in the fraud; the respondents' allegations were speculative and unsupported by evidence. Consequently, the sale and transfer of title to the respondents were declared void. The Registrar of Deeds was directed to cancel the fraudulent deed of transfer and related endorsements in terms of section 6(2) of the Deeds Registries Act. No order as to costs was...
- Citation
- [2021] ZAGPJHC 781
- Parties
- Applicant: Maria Dianetsi Tsotetsi; Respondent: Elias Mzwakhe Mkhwebane; Respondent: Sarah Nasinda Mkhwebane; Respondent: Registrar of Deeds; Respondent: Ekhureleni Metropolitan Municipality
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 6 December 2021
- Case Number
- 40252/19
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted. The sale and transfer of the property to the respondents are declared void and set aside. The Registrar of Deeds is directed to cancel the fraudulent deed of transfer and related endorsements. No order as to costs.
- Judges
- SK Hassim
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Transfer, Deeds Registries Act, Void Sale, Cancellation of Title, Property Ownership
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maria Dianetsi Tsotetsi
Applicant
Elias Mzwakhe Mkhwebane
Respondent
Sarah Nasinda Mkhwebane
Respondent
Registrar of Deeds
Respondent
Ekhureleni Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sale of the property to the respondents was fraudulent and void.
- 2 Whether the transfer of title to the respondents should be set aside.
- 3 Whether the Registrar of Deeds should cancel the title deed and related endorsements.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the sale of the property to the respondents was fraudulent, as it was effected by an imposter who unlawfully impersonated the applicant and used forged documents. The respondents admitted the fraudulent nature of the transaction both in correspondence and in their answering affidavit. The applicant was not complicit in the fraud; the respondents' allegations were speculative and unsupported by evidence. Consequently, the sale and transfer of title to the respondents were declared void. The Registrar of Deeds was directed to cancel the fraudulent deed of transfer and related endorsements in terms of section 6(2) of the Deeds Registries Act. No order as to costs was...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The sale and transfer of the property to the respondents are declared void and set aside. The Registrar of Deeds is directed to cancel the fraudulent deed of transfer and related endorsements. No order as to costs.
Orders
- The sale of erf [....] Tsakane Extension 12 Township to the respondents in terms of the deed of sale signed on 20 June 2018 is void and set aside.
- The transfer of title to the respondents under Deed of Transfer No. T31544/2018 is declared null and void.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment