Tsunke v ABSA Bank Ltd and Others (NCT/ 274/2009/138 (1)(P)) [2010] ZANCT 9 (21 January 2010)
The Tribunal found that the applicant and all respondents are parties to a debt rearrangement agreement facilitated by a debt counsellor in terms of the National Credit Act. All parties have consented to the proposed restructuring of payment instalments, and the agreement was properly documented and submitted. The Tribunal is satisfied that the requirements of section 86(7)(b) and section 138(1) of the Act have been met. Accordingly, the Tribunal confirms the draft consent order as an order of the Tribunal, warning the parties that non-compliance constitutes an offence under the Act.
- Citation
- [2010] ZANCT 9
- Parties
- Applicant: Matloane Maurice Meshack Tsunke; Respondent: ABSA Bank Limited; Respondent: IEMAS; Respondent: Truworths Limited; Respondent: Woolworths
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 21 January 2010
- Case Number
- NCT/ 274/2009/138 (1)(P)
- Procedural Posture
- Consent Order Application / Final Order
- Outcome
- Consent order granted; debt restructuring agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- Judges
- XOLELA MAY
- Legal Topics
- National Credit Act, Debt Restructuring, Consent Order, Consumer Protection
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Matloane Maurice Meshack Tsunke
Applicant
ABSA Bank Limited
Respondent
IEMAS
Respondent
Truworths Limited
Respondent
Woolworths
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Consent Order Application / Final Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Tribunal should confirm the debt rearrangement agreement as a consent order under the National Credit Act.
- 2 Whether the parties have validly consented to the proposed debt restructuring.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the applicant and all respondents are parties to a debt rearrangement agreement facilitated by a debt counsellor in terms of the National Credit Act. All parties have consented to the proposed restructuring of payment instalments, and the agreement was properly documented and submitted. The Tribunal is satisfied that the requirements of section 86(7)(b) and section 138(1) of the Act have been met. Accordingly, the Tribunal confirms the draft consent order as an order of the Tribunal, warning the parties that non-compliance constitutes an offence under the Act.
Court Disposition
Consent order granted; debt restructuring agreement confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
Orders
- The draft consent order attached as Annexure 'A' is confirmed as an order of the Tribunal.
- The payment structures set out in Annexure 'B' are made an order of the Tribunal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment