Tswana Quantity Surveyers and Project Managers CC v Gamagara Deveopment Forum (1626/2019) [2020] ZANCHC 34 (28 May 2020)
The applicant established its entitlement to have the arbitration award made an order of court under section 31(1) of the Arbitration Act. The respondent failed to raise any genuine or material dispute of fact, relying on bare denials and irrelevant allegations regarding third party liability and pending actions. The respondent's conduct, including delay and participation after the statutory time limit, amounted to a waiver of any right to object to the timing of the award. The respondent did not lodge any rescission application or counter-application to set aside the award, nor did it provide valid reasons for its absence from the arbitration. The court found the applicant's factual...
- Citation
- [2020] ZANCHC 34
- Parties
- Applicant: Tswana Quantity Surveyers and Project Managers CC; Respondent: Gamagara Development Forum
- Court
- Northern Cape High Court, Kimberley
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 May 2020
- Case Number
- 1626/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Final Order to Make Arbitration Award an Order of Court
- Outcome
- Application granted. The arbitration award is made an order of court. Costs awarded against the respondent.
- Judges
- Nxumalo AJ
- Legal Topics
- Arbitration Act Section 31, Enforcement of Arbitration Award, Res Judicata, Joinder of Parties, Waiver of Rights, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tswana Quantity Surveyers and Project Managers CC
Applicant
Gamagara Development Forum
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Final Order to Make Arbitration Award an Order of Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has made out a case for the arbitration award to be made an order of court.
- 2 Whether there exists a material dispute of fact justifying dismissal or referral to oral evidence.
- 3 Whether the respondent's opposition and allegations regarding third party liability and non-joinder are sufficient to defeat the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant established its entitlement to have the arbitration award made an order of court under section 31(1) of the Arbitration Act. The respondent failed to raise any genuine or material dispute of fact, relying on bare denials and irrelevant allegations regarding third party liability and pending actions. The respondent's conduct, including delay and participation after the statutory time limit, amounted to a waiver of any right to object to the timing of the award. The respondent did not lodge any rescission application or counter-application to set aside the award, nor did it provide valid reasons for its absence from the arbitration. The court found the applicant's factual...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The arbitration award is made an order of court. Costs awarded against the respondent.
Orders
- The arbitrator’s award by Advocate JA Babamia dated 22 October 2018 is made an order of court in terms of section 31(1) of the Arbitration Act 42 of 1965.
- The respondent is to pay the costs of this application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment