Twenty-Third Century Systems (Pty) Ltd and Another v SAP Africa Region (Pty) Ltd (172/2023) [2025] ZASCA 51; [2025] 3 All SA 62 (SCA) (30 April 2025)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the exclusion of damages and time bar clauses in the agreement are secondary obligations that survive termination, including termination by repudiation, as expressly provided by the survival clause. The Court distinguished between primary obligations, which end upon acceptance of repudiation, and secondary obligations, which regulate post-termination consequences and endure as per the contract. The doctrine of approbation and reprobation does not preclude SAP from relying on these clauses, as the parties agreed they would survive any termination. The appeal was dismissed, and SAP was entitled to rely on the limitation of liability and time bar clauses...
- Citation
- [2025] ZASCA 51
- Parties
- Appellant: Twenty-Third Century Systems (Pty) Ltd; Appellant: Systems Global (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: SAP Africa Region (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 30 April 2025
- Case Number
- 172/2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Gauteng Division of the High Court, Johannesburg
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed. Costs awarded to respondent, including costs of two counsel.
- Judges
- Mocumie, Kgoele, Kathree-Setiloane, Windell, Bloem
- Legal Topics
- Contract Repudiation, Survival Clause, Limitation of Liability, Time Bar, Approbation and Reprobation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Twenty-Third Century Systems (Pty) Ltd
Appellant
Systems Global (Pty) Ltd
Appellant
SAP Africa Region (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Gauteng Division of the High Court, Johannesburg
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a contracting party can rely on exclusion of damages and time bar clauses after termination of the contract due to repudiation.
- 2 Whether the survival clause in the agreement allows SAP to rely on limitation of liability and time bar provisions post-repudiation.
- 3 Whether the doctrine of approbation and reprobation precludes SAP from relying on contractual clauses after breach.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that the exclusion of damages and time bar clauses in the agreement are secondary obligations that survive termination, including termination by repudiation, as expressly provided by the survival clause. The Court distinguished between primary obligations, which end upon acceptance of repudiation, and secondary obligations, which regulate post-termination consequences and endure as per the contract. The doctrine of approbation and reprobation does not preclude SAP from relying on these clauses, as the parties agreed they would survive any termination. The appeal was dismissed, and SAP was entitled to rely on the limitation of liability and time bar clauses...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed. Costs awarded to respondent, including costs of two counsel.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed.
- The first appellant shall pay the respondent’s costs, such costs to include the costs of two counsel, where so employed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment