Twilight Breeze Trading 119 CC and Another v Mantsopa Local Municipality and Others (4134/2017) [2018] ZAFSHC 5 (1 February 2018)
The court found that the applicants' contract as Pound Master had expired and was not renewed. There was no evidence that the applicants submitted a valid application in response to the latest advertisement, nor that the process was flawed in a manner that would entitle them to relief. The municipality was entitled to appoint a new Pound Master, and the applicants' continued occupation of the pound property was unlawful in the absence of a valid contract. The pending review application did not confer a right to remain in occupation. The requirements of the advertisement were clear and complied with the relevant provincial notice, and the appointment of the third respondent was not shown...
- Citation
- [2018] ZAFSHC 5
- Parties
- Applicant: Twilight Breeze Trading 119 CC; Applicant: Samila Abdula; Respondent: Mantsopa Local Municipality; Respondent: The Municipal Manager: Mantsopa Local Municipality; Respondent: Ntilane Hanyane
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 1 February 2018
- Case Number
- 4134/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Rule Nisi and Interim Interdict Pending Review; Final Determination of Interim Relief
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; rule nisi discharged; costs awarded against applicants jointly and severally.
- Judges
- MBHELE
- Legal Topics
- Municipal Tender Process, Appointment of Pound Master, Service Level Agreement, Security of Tenure, Review of Administrative Action
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Twilight Breeze Trading 119 CC
Applicant
Samila Abdula
Applicant
Mantsopa Local Municipality
Respondent
The Municipal Manager: Mantsopa Local Municipality
Respondent
Ntilane Hanyane
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Rule Nisi and Interim Interdict Pending Review; Final Determination of Interim Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to remain in occupation of the municipal pound pending the outcome of the review application.
- 2 Whether the appointment of the third respondent as Pound Master was lawful and in accordance with the municipality's policies.
- 3 Whether the applicants' contract as Pound Master was validly terminated and whether they have any residual rights to occupy the property.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants' contract as Pound Master had expired and was not renewed. There was no evidence that the applicants submitted a valid application in response to the latest advertisement, nor that the process was flawed in a manner that would entitle them to relief. The municipality was entitled to appoint a new Pound Master, and the applicants' continued occupation of the pound property was unlawful in the absence of a valid contract. The pending review application did not confer a right to remain in occupation. The requirements of the advertisement were clear and complied with the relevant provincial notice, and the appointment of the third respondent was not shown...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; rule nisi discharged; costs awarded against applicants jointly and severally.
Orders
- The rule nisi is discharged.
- First and second applicant to pay the cost of this application jointly and severally, one paying to absolve the other.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment