Universal Pulse Trading 18 (Pty) Ltd v Aveng (Africa) Pty) Ltd and Another (2021-54340) [2021] ZAGPJHC 117 (21 November 2021)

Universal Pulse Trading 18 (Pty) Ltd v Aveng (Africa) Pty) Ltd and Another (2021-54340) [2021] ZAGPJHC 117 (21 November 2021)

The court found that the applicant's delay in bringing the urgent application, having threatened such action over a year earlier, rendered the urgency entirely self-created. The applicant failed to act promptly and provided no satisfactory explanation for the delay. As a result, the application was struck off the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] ZAGPJHC 117
Parties
Applicant: Universal Pulse Trading 18 (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Aveng (Africa) Pty Ltd; Respondent: Galetti Auction
Court
South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Case Number
2021-54340
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Urgent Interdict
Outcome
Application struck off the roll for lack of urgency. Applicant ordered to pay costs on attorney and client scale.
Judges
Wright
Legal Topics
Urgent Interdict, Self Created Urgency, Costs Order, Property Auction
Civil Procedure Land and Property Urgent Interdict Self Created Urgency Costs Order Property Auction

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Universal Pulse Trading 18 (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Aveng (Africa) Pty Ltd

Respondent

Galetti Auction

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Application for Urgent Interdict

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an urgent interdict preventing the auction of the disputed property.
  2. 2 Whether the urgency of the application is self-created and justifies a punitive costs order.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's delay in bringing the urgent application, having threatened such action over a year earlier, rendered the urgency entirely self-created. The applicant failed to act promptly and provided no satisfactory explanation for the delay. As a result, the application was struck off the roll for lack of genuine urgency. The court further held that the applicant's conduct justified a punitive costs order on the attorney and client scale, including the costs of counsel where employed.

Court Disposition

Application struck off the roll for lack of urgency. Applicant ordered to pay costs on attorney and client scale.

Orders

  • The application is struck off the roll.
  • The applicant is to pay the costs of the first respondent on the scale as between attorney and client, including those of counsel where so employed.