Tasima (Pty) Ltd v Road Traffic Management Corporation and Others (J890/17) [2017] ZALCJHB 198; (2017) 38 ILJ 2385 (LC) (25 May 2017)
The Court held that the handover of the eNaTIS system and services from Tasima to the RTMC, pursuant to the Constitutional Court’s order, constituted a transfer of a business as a going concern under section 197 of the Labour Relations Act. The Court rejected RTMC’s argument that section 197 does not apply to public entities or non-profit undertakings, finding that the statutory definition of ‘business’ is broad and includes services rendered by public bodies. The Court found that the RTMC had taken over the entirety of Tasima’s business, including its premises, assets, and ongoing operations, and that the employment contracts of Tasima’s employees transferred automatically to RTMC on 5...
- Citation
- [2017] ZALCJHB 198
- Parties
- Applicant: Tasima (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Road Traffic Management Corporation; Respondent: Department of Transport; Respondent: Director General: Department of Transport; Respondent: Minister of Transport; Respondent: Employees listed in Annex “A”
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 25 May 2017
- Case Number
- J 890/17
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Judgment on Urgent Application for Declaratory Relief Under S 197 LRA
- Outcome
- Application granted. The contracts of employment of the 5th to 84th respondents transferred automatically from Tasima to RTMC on 5 April 2017 under section 197 of the LRA.
- Judges
- A J Steenkamp
- Legal Topics
- Automatic Transfer of Employment, Section 197 Lra, Business as Going Concern, Public Sector Transfer, Estoppel, Confidentiality of Employee Data
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Tasima (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Road Traffic Management Corporation
Respondent
Department of Transport
Respondent
Director General: Department of Transport
Respondent
Minister of Transport
Respondent
Employees listed in Annex “A”
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Judgment on Urgent Application for Declaratory Relief Under S 197 LRA
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the handover of the eNaTIS system and services from Tasima to RTMC constitutes a transfer of a business as a going concern under section 197 of the Labour Relations Act.
- 2 Whether the contracts of employment of Tasima’s employees transferred automatically to RTMC upon the handover.
- 3 Whether section 197 applies to transfers involving public entities and non-profit generating undertakings.
Ratio Decidendi
The Court held that the handover of the eNaTIS system and services from Tasima to the RTMC, pursuant to the Constitutional Court’s order, constituted a transfer of a business as a going concern under section 197 of the Labour Relations Act. The Court rejected RTMC’s argument that section 197 does not apply to public entities or non-profit undertakings, finding that the statutory definition of ‘business’ is broad and includes services rendered by public bodies. The Court found that the RTMC had taken over the entirety of Tasima’s business, including its premises, assets, and ongoing operations, and that the employment contracts of Tasima’s employees transferred automatically to RTMC on 5...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The contracts of employment of the 5th to 84th respondents transferred automatically from Tasima to RTMC on 5 April 2017 under section 197 of the LRA.
Orders
- It is declared that, with effect from 5 April 2017, the contracts of employment of the 5th to 84th respondents transferred automatically from Tasima (Pty) Ltd to the Road Traffic Management Corporation in accordance with section 197 of the Labour Relations Act.
- The RTMC is directed to pay the 5th to 84th respondents from 5 April 2017 to the date of final determination, on a monthly basis, the amounts set forth in the schedule annexed to the founding affidavit, and on an annual basis, any additional amounts making up the annual total cost to company.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment