South African Local Government Association v Independent Municipal And Allied Trade Union and Others (JA46/2012) [2014] ZALAC 4; [2014] 6 BLLR 569 (LAC) (25 February 2014)
The Labour Appeal Court held that no binding collective agreement was concluded on 20 April 2010 because the Bargaining Committee did not reconvene to formally adopt the drafting team’s proposals, and the agreement was not signed by all parties as contemplated by the Constitution of the Bargaining Council. The evidence did not establish a well-entrenched practice or custom that could override the express constitutional requirements for decision-making. The parties themselves did not consider the unsigned agreement binding, as evidenced by their conduct and arrangements for a signing ceremony. Rectification was not available because the respondents failed to prove that all principals...
- Citation
- [2014] ZALAC 4
- Parties
- Appellant: South African Local Government Association; Respondent: Independent Municipal and Allied Trade Union; Respondent: South African Municipal Workers’ Union; Respondent: South African Local Government Bargaining Council
- Court
- Labour Appeal Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 25 February 2014
- Case Number
- JA46/2012
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld. Application dismissed. No order as to costs.
- Judges
- Waglay, C J Musi, Mokgoatlheng
- Legal Topics
- Collective Agreements, Rectification, Constitution of Bargaining Council, Custom and Practice, Binding Effect of Agreements
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
South African Local Government Association
Appellant
Independent Municipal and Allied Trade Union
Respondent
South African Municipal Workers’ Union
Respondent
South African Local Government Bargaining Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a collective agreement was validly concluded on 20 April 2010 without signature.
- 2 Whether practice or custom can override the express terms of the Bargaining Council’s Constitution.
- 3 Whether rectification of the signed agreement is permissible where no prior binding agreement existed.
Ratio Decidendi
The Labour Appeal Court held that no binding collective agreement was concluded on 20 April 2010 because the Bargaining Committee did not reconvene to formally adopt the drafting team’s proposals, and the agreement was not signed by all parties as contemplated by the Constitution of the Bargaining Council. The evidence did not establish a well-entrenched practice or custom that could override the express constitutional requirements for decision-making. The parties themselves did not consider the unsigned agreement binding, as evidenced by their conduct and arrangements for a signing ceremony. Rectification was not available because the respondents failed to prove that all principals...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld. Application dismissed. No order as to costs.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld with no order as to costs.
- The order of the court a quo is set aside and replaced with: The application is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment