De Villiers NO and Another v BOE Bank Limited (477/2002) [2003] ZASCA 101; [2004] 2 All SA 457 (SCA); 2004 (3) SA 1 (SCA) (26 September 2003)

De Villiers NO and Another v BOE Bank Limited (477/2002) [2003] ZASCA 101; [2004] 2 All SA 457 (SCA); 2004 (3) SA 1 (SCA) (26 September 2003)

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that, despite the absence of a formal resolution by Intramed's directors, the loan agreements and securities were authorised through the unanimous assent and acquiescence of all relevant directors and shareholders. Intramed, as the nominated borrower, received the R100 million by instructing payment to the Macmed rights offer account, and was thus liable for repayment. However, the suspensive condition requiring a final unconditional agreement between Aspen and Intramed was not fulfilled, nor was its waiver effected in writing as required by the entrenchment clauses of the loan agreements. The absence of written waiver rendered the agreements lapsed, and...

Citation
[2003] ZASCA 101
Parties
Appellant: Michael De Villiers, N.O.; Appellant: Brian Basil Nel, N.O.; Respondent: BOE Bank Limited
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
26 September 2003
Case Number
477/2002
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From the South Eastern Cape Local Division, High Court
Outcome
Appeal upheld in part; the order of the court below amended to reflect restitution rather than contractual damages and interest.
Judges
Howie, Streicher, Navsa, Heher, Van Heerden
Legal Topics
Company Authorisation, Loan Agreements, Suspensive Conditions, Waiver of Contractual Rights, Entrenchment Clauses, Restitution
Commercial and Corporate Civil Procedure Company Authorisation Loan Agreements Suspensive Conditions Waiver of Contractual Rights Entrenchment Clauses Restitution

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Michael De Villiers, N.O.

Appellant

Brian Basil Nel, N.O.

Appellant

BOE Bank Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From the South Eastern Cape Local Division, High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the loan agreements and securities were duly authorised by Intramed.
  2. 2 Whether Intramed received the R100 million advanced under the loan agreements.
  3. 3 Whether the non-fulfilment of a suspensive condition caused the loan agreements to lapse.

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court of Appeal held that, despite the absence of a formal resolution by Intramed's directors, the loan agreements and securities were authorised through the unanimous assent and acquiescence of all relevant directors and shareholders. Intramed, as the nominated borrower, received the R100 million by instructing payment to the Macmed rights offer account, and was thus liable for repayment. However, the suspensive condition requiring a final unconditional agreement between Aspen and Intramed was not fulfilled, nor was its waiver effected in writing as required by the entrenchment clauses of the loan agreements. The absence of written waiver rendered the agreements lapsed, and...

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld in part; the order of the court below amended to reflect restitution rather than contractual damages and interest.

Orders

  • The defendants are ordered to pay the plaintiff the amount of R113,177,568.51.
  • It is declared that the claims by the plaintiff are secured by the securities annexed as 'G', 'I', and 'J' to the plaintiff's particulars of claim.