Experian South Africa (Pty) Ltd v National Credit Regulator, In Re: National Credit Regulator v Experian South Africa (Pty) Ltd (NCT/128838/2019/140(1)Rule34) [2019] ZANCT 94 (4 June 2019)

Experian South Africa (Pty) Ltd v National Credit Regulator, In Re: National Credit Regulator v Experian South Africa (Pty) Ltd (NCT/128838/2019/140(1)Rule34) [2019] ZANCT 94 (4 June 2019)

The Tribunal found that Experian provided a reasonable explanation for the one-day delay in filing its answering affidavit, citing the complexity and volume of the matter. The delay was not excessive, and Experian would suffer prejudice if denied the opportunity to respond to serious allegations and the administrative fine sought by the NCR. The interests of justice required that all facts be placed before the Tribunal and that both parties be allowed to fully ventilate their cases. Accordingly, condonation for the late filing was granted.

Citation
[2019] ZANCT 94
Parties
Applicant: Experian South Africa (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: National Credit Regulator
Court
National Consumer Tribunal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
4 June 2019
Case Number
NCT/128838/2019/140(1) Rule 34
Procedural Posture
Condonation Application / Interlocutory Application for Condonation of Late Filing of Answering Affidavit
Outcome
Condonation for the late filing of the answering affidavit is granted.
Judges
H Devraj
Legal Topics
Condonation, Late Filing of Affidavit, Tribunal Rules, Interests of Justice
Civil Procedure Condonation Late Filing of Affidavit Tribunal Rules Interests of Justice

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Experian South Africa (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

National Credit Regulator

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Condonation Application / Interlocutory Application for Condonation of Late Filing of Answering Affidavit

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether condonation should be granted for the late filing of the answering affidavit by Experian.
  2. 2 Whether Experian will suffer prejudice if condonation is refused.
  3. 3 Whether the delay was unreasonable or excessive.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that Experian provided a reasonable explanation for the one-day delay in filing its answering affidavit, citing the complexity and volume of the matter. The delay was not excessive, and Experian would suffer prejudice if denied the opportunity to respond to serious allegations and the administrative fine sought by the NCR. The interests of justice required that all facts be placed before the Tribunal and that both parties be allowed to fully ventilate their cases. Accordingly, condonation for the late filing was granted.

Court Disposition

Condonation for the late filing of the answering affidavit is granted.

Orders

  • The condonation application for the late filing of the answering affidavit is granted.
  • The National Credit Regulator must file its replying affidavit within 10 days of receipt of this ruling.