Economic Freedom Fighters and Others v Chairperson of the Powers and Privileges Committee N.O and Others (23230/2023) [2024] ZAWCHC 16 (30 January 2024)

Economic Freedom Fighters and Others v Chairperson of the Powers and Privileges Committee N.O and Others (23230/2023) [2024] ZAWCHC 16 (30 January 2024)

The majority held that the applicants, as dominus litis, failed to comply with agreed court orders and did not provide adequate reasons for their late filings, particularly the heads of argument. This conduct prejudiced both the respondents and the court, undermining the efficient administration of justice and disadvantaging other litigants. The court emphasized that compliance with court orders is essential to maintain the integrity of judicial proceedings. Given the absence of reasons for non-compliance and the prejudice caused, the application was struck from the roll, with costs awarded against the applicants. The dissenting judge would have granted condonation and allowed the parties...

Citation
[2024] ZAWCHC 16
Parties
Applicant: Economic Freedom Fighters; Applicant: Julius Sello Malema, MP; Applicant: Nyiko Floyd Shivambu, MP; Applicant: Mbuyiseni Quintin Ndlozi, MP; Applicant: Marshall Mzingisi Dlamini, MP; Applicant: Vuyani Pambo, MP; Applicant: Sinawo Tambo, MP; Respondent: Chairperson of the Powers and Privileges Committee N.O.; Respondent: Speaker of the National Assembly; Respondent: Secretary to Parliament; Respondent: Initiator N.O.; Respondent: Minister of Justice and Correctional Services; Respondent: Chairperson of the National Council of Provinces
Court
Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
30 January 2024
Case Number
23230/2023
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Condonation and Striking From the Roll
Outcome
Application for condonation granted for late replying affidavit; main application struck from the roll; costs awarded against applicants.
Judges
Erasmus, Cloete, Thulare
Legal Topics
Condonation, Late Filing, Access to Courts, Court Orders, Urgent Interdict
Civil Procedure Constitutional Law Condonation Late Filing Access to Courts Court Orders Urgent Interdict

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Economic Freedom Fighters

Applicant

Julius Sello Malema, MP

Applicant

Nyiko Floyd Shivambu, MP

Applicant

Mbuyiseni Quintin Ndlozi, MP

Applicant

Marshall Mzingisi Dlamini, MP

Applicant

Vuyani Pambo, MP

Applicant

Sinawo Tambo, MP

Applicant

Chairperson of the Powers and Privileges Committee N.O.

Respondent

Speaker of the National Assembly

Respondent

Secretary to Parliament

Respondent

Initiator N.O.

Respondent

Minister of Justice and Correctional Services

Respondent

Chairperson of the National Council of Provinces

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Application for Condonation and Striking From the Roll

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the applicants' non-compliance with a court order regarding filing deadlines should be condoned.
  2. 2 Whether the application should be struck from the roll due to non-compliance and prejudice to respondents and the court.
  3. 3 Whether the applicants' right of access to courts is infringed by striking the matter from the roll.

Ratio Decidendi

The majority held that the applicants, as dominus litis, failed to comply with agreed court orders and did not provide adequate reasons for their late filings, particularly the heads of argument. This conduct prejudiced both the respondents and the court, undermining the efficient administration of justice and disadvantaging other litigants. The court emphasized that compliance with court orders is essential to maintain the integrity of judicial proceedings. Given the absence of reasons for non-compliance and the prejudice caused, the application was struck from the roll, with costs awarded against the applicants. The dissenting judge would have granted condonation and allowed the parties...

Court Disposition

Application for condonation granted for late replying affidavit; main application struck from the roll; costs awarded against applicants.

Orders

  • The application for condonation for the late filing of the applicants' replying affidavit is granted.
  • Save as aforesaid, the application is struck from the roll.