Eastern Cape NGO Coalition v MEC for the Department of Social Development, Eastern Cape Province (2460/2018) [2021] ZAECGHC 36 (16 March 2021)
The court found that while the Department's policy shift towards transformation and rural prioritisation was constitutionally permissible, the process by which subsidies were reduced lacked proper consultation with affected NGOs. The meetings relied upon by the respondent did not constitute genuine consultation, as they occurred after the decision to reduce subsidies had already been made. The absence of meaningful engagement violated the principles of rationality and responsiveness required by the Constitution and the applicable policy and service level agreements. Although the reduction of subsidies itself was not objectionable given budgetary constraints and transformation imperatives,...
- Citation
- [2021] ZAECGHC 36
- Parties
- Applicant: Eastern Cape NGO Coalition; Respondent: MEC for the Department of Social Development, Eastern Cape Province
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Grahamstown
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2021
- Case Number
- 2460/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- The respondent's decision to reduce or terminate NGO subsidies in 2017/2018 is declared irrational and unlawful due to lack of proper consultation. Prayers for further relief, including compensation and setting aside the allocations, are dismissed. The respondent is ordered to pay 60% of the applicant's taxed costs.
- Judges
- A Govindjee
- Legal Topics
- Consultation Requirements, Irrationality Review, Social Security Rights, Public Administration Principles, Legitimate Expectation
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eastern Cape NGO Coalition
Applicant
MEC for the Department of Social Development, Eastern Cape Province
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Was the respondent's decision to reduce or terminate NGO subsidies in 2017/2018 unlawful and unconstitutional due to lack of consultation?
- 2 Did the process followed by the Department meet the requirements of rationality and legality under the Constitution?
- 3 Is there a duty to consult NGOs prior to subsidy reductions?
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that while the Department's policy shift towards transformation and rural prioritisation was constitutionally permissible, the process by which subsidies were reduced lacked proper consultation with affected NGOs. The meetings relied upon by the respondent did not constitute genuine consultation, as they occurred after the decision to reduce subsidies had already been made. The absence of meaningful engagement violated the principles of rationality and responsiveness required by the Constitution and the applicable policy and service level agreements. Although the reduction of subsidies itself was not objectionable given budgetary constraints and transformation imperatives,...
Court Disposition
The respondent's decision to reduce or terminate NGO subsidies in 2017/2018 is declared irrational and unlawful due to lack of proper consultation. Prayers for further relief, including compensation and setting aside the allocations, are dismissed. The respondent is ordered to pay 60% of the applicant's taxed costs.
Orders
- The respondent's decision to reduce or terminate subsidies given to non-governmental organisations in 2017/2018 is declared to be irrational and unlawful.
- Prayers 2, 3 and 4 of the Notice of Motion are dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment