FourieFismer Inc and Others v Road Accident Fund; Mabunda Inc and Others v Road Accident Fund; Diale Mogashoa Inc v Road Accident Fund (17518/2020; 15876/2020; 18239/2020) [2020] ZAGPPHC 293 (8 July 2020)
The court found that the applicants had proven exceptional circumstances due to the RAF's deliberate non-compliance with previous court orders, the resultant chaos in the judicial system, and prejudice to claimants and panel attorneys. The RAF's conduct was aimed at rendering the order moot, and the applicants, as well as the public, would suffer irreparable harm if execution was not granted. The RAF failed to demonstrate any irreparable harm to itself. The court exercised its inherent jurisdiction to attach conditions to the execution order, confining the RAF to use only panel attorneys as at 10 March 2020 for personal injury claims under the Road Accident Fund Act, pending finalisation...
- Citation
- [2020] ZAGPPHC 293
- Parties
- Applicant: FourieFismer Inc. and Two Others; Intervening Party: Maponya Inc; Respondent: Road Accident Fund; Respondent: The Chairperson of the Board of the RAF; Respondent: The Chief Executive Officer of the RAF; Respondent: The Minister of Transport; Applicant: Mabunda Inc. and Forty-Two Others; Intervening Party: Law Society of South Africa; Applicant: Diale Mogashoa Inc.
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 8 July 2020
- Case Number
- 17518/2020; 15876/2020; 18239/2020
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Execution Order Pending Petition for Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application for execution order granted; supplementary relief partially granted; costs awarded against respondents except the Minister of Transport.
- Judges
- Hughes
- Legal Topics
- Execution Pending Appeal, Exceptional Circumstances, Irreparable Harm, Service Level Agreement, Road Accident Fund Act, Panel Attorneys
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
FourieFismer Inc. and Two Others
Applicant
Maponya Inc
Intervening Party
Road Accident Fund
Respondent
The Chairperson of the Board of the RAF
Respondent
The Chief Executive Officer of the RAF
Respondent
The Minister of Transport
Respondent
Mabunda Inc. and Forty-Two Others
Applicant
Law Society of South Africa
Intervening Party
Diale Mogashoa Inc.
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Execution Order Pending Petition for Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have proven exceptional circumstances justifying execution of the order pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the applicants have demonstrated irreparable harm to themselves and absence of such harm to the respondents.
- 3 Whether the Road Accident Fund is bound to use only panel attorneys as at 10 March 2020 pending finalisation of appeals.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicants had proven exceptional circumstances due to the RAF's deliberate non-compliance with previous court orders, the resultant chaos in the judicial system, and prejudice to claimants and panel attorneys. The RAF's conduct was aimed at rendering the order moot, and the applicants, as well as the public, would suffer irreparable harm if execution was not granted. The RAF failed to demonstrate any irreparable harm to itself. The court exercised its inherent jurisdiction to attach conditions to the execution order, confining the RAF to use only panel attorneys as at 10 March 2020 for personal injury claims under the Road Accident Fund Act, pending finalisation...
Court Disposition
Application for execution order granted; supplementary relief partially granted; costs awarded against respondents except the Minister of Transport.
Orders
- The Law Society of South Africa is granted leave to intervene in the Mabunda application.
- Respondents are granted condonation for late filing of answering affidavit.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment