Fidelity Security Services (Pty) Ltd v Minister of Police and Others (45537/2016) [2019] ZAGPPHC 234 (21 June 2019)
The court held that the Firearms Control Act is explicit: renewal applications must be lodged at least 90 days before expiry, and if not, the licence terminates and possession becomes unlawful. The Constitutional Court has confirmed the validity of these provisions and rejected arguments for acceptance of late applications or interim authorisations. The applicant's attempt to distinguish ownership from possession is unsustainable, as the Act regulates possession regardless of ownership. The right to conduct business under section 22 of the Constitution does not entitle the applicant to circumvent statutory requirements. The applicant's arguments were previously rejected by the highest...
- Citation
- [2019] ZAGPPHC 234
- Parties
- Applicant: Fidelity Security Services (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Minister of Police; Respondent: Minister of Justice; Respondent: Acting National Commissioner of the South African Police Services: J K Phahlane
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 21 June 2019
- Case Number
- 45537/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application dismissed with costs on the attorney and client scale, including costs of senior counsel.
- Judges
- Ranchod
- Legal Topics
- Firearms Control Act, Late Renewal Applications, Administrative Directives, Constitutional Validity, Section 33 Rights, Section 22 Trade Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Fidelity Security Services (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Minister of Police
Respondent
Minister of Justice
Respondent
Acting National Commissioner of the South African Police Services: J K Phahlane
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the refusal by the third respondent to accept late applications for renewal of firearm licences or new applications for firearms whose licences have expired is lawful.
- 2 Whether, pending determination of renewal or new applications, the third respondent should issue authorisations to the applicant to possess the firearms in the interim.
- 3 Whether the applicant's rights under section 22 and section 33 of the Constitution are infringed by the refusal to accept late applications.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the Firearms Control Act is explicit: renewal applications must be lodged at least 90 days before expiry, and if not, the licence terminates and possession becomes unlawful. The Constitutional Court has confirmed the validity of these provisions and rejected arguments for acceptance of late applications or interim authorisations. The applicant's attempt to distinguish ownership from possession is unsustainable, as the Act regulates possession regardless of ownership. The right to conduct business under section 22 of the Constitution does not entitle the applicant to circumvent statutory requirements. The applicant's arguments were previously rejected by the highest...
Court Disposition
Application dismissed with costs on the attorney and client scale, including costs of senior counsel.
Orders
- The application is dismissed.
- The applicant is ordered to pay the costs of the application on the scale as between attorney and client, including the costs of senior counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment