eMedia Investments Proprietary Limited v Multichoice Proprietary Limited and Others (248/CAC/Jul23 CT; IR194Mar22) [2023] ZACAC 3 (28 July 2023)
The court held that the words 'a further period' in section 49C(5) of the Competition Act do not restrict the Tribunal to granting only one extension of interim relief. The Tribunal retains the power to grant multiple extensions if justified by the circumstances and the requirements of the Act. The court directed the Tribunal to determine eMedia's application for a further extension on the papers filed before the Appeal Court, provided the application is filed by the specified deadline. Pending the Tribunal's determination, MultiChoice is ordered to maintain the status quo and is interdicted from removing the specified channels from the DStv platform. The Tribunal's previous order is...
- Citation
- [2023] ZACAC 3
- Parties
- Applicant: eMedia Investments Proprietary Limited; Respondent: Multichoice Proprietary Limited; Respondent: Competition Commission; Respondent: Minister of Trade and Industry and Competition; Respondent: Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
- Court
- Competition Appeal Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2023
- Case Number
- 248/CAC/Jul23 CT
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Court Order Following Urgent Application for Extension of Interim Relief.
- Outcome
- Application granted. Declaration made regarding interpretation of section 49C(5). Tribunal directed to determine extension application. Status quo maintained pending determination. No order as to costs.
- Judges
- N. Manoim, D. Davis, V. Nkosi
- Legal Topics
- Interim Relief, Extension of Tribunal Orders, Interpretation of Statute, Status Quo Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
eMedia Investments Proprietary Limited
Applicant
Multichoice Proprietary Limited
Respondent
Competition Commission
Respondent
Minister of Trade and Industry and Competition
Respondent
Minister of Justice and Correctional Services
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Court Order Following Urgent Application for Extension of Interim Relief.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 49C(5) of the Competition Act restricts the Tribunal to granting only one extension of interim relief.
- 2 Whether the Tribunal may consider a further extension application on the papers filed before the Appeal Court.
- 3 Whether MultiChoice must maintain the status quo pending the Tribunal's determination.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the words 'a further period' in section 49C(5) of the Competition Act do not restrict the Tribunal to granting only one extension of interim relief. The Tribunal retains the power to grant multiple extensions if justified by the circumstances and the requirements of the Act. The court directed the Tribunal to determine eMedia's application for a further extension on the papers filed before the Appeal Court, provided the application is filed by the specified deadline. Pending the Tribunal's determination, MultiChoice is ordered to maintain the status quo and is interdicted from removing the specified channels from the DStv platform. The Tribunal's previous order is...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Declaration made regarding interpretation of section 49C(5). Tribunal directed to determine extension application. Status quo maintained pending determination. No order as to costs.
Orders
- It is declared that section 49C(5) does not limit the Tribunal to granting only one extension of interim relief.
- The Tribunal is directed to determine eMedia's application for a further extension on the papers filed before the Appeal Court, provided the application is filed by 16h00 on 31 July 2023.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment