Babereki Consulting Engineers CC v Minister: Government of the Republic of South Africa: Department of Water and Sanitation and Others (890/2016) [2016] ZAFSHC 115 (30 June 2016)
The court found that the applicant failed to make out a proper case for the granting of an interim order, as the founding affidavit did not contain sufficient averments regarding exclusive rights or the scope of works to demonstrate infringement. The absence of documentary evidence, such as the contract, rendered it impossible to conclude that a prima facie right was established. The court further held that media reports do not constitute proper service of court proceedings and rejected the argument that the second respondent's absence was wilful. The application for leave to appeal was dismissed as there were no reasonable prospects of success on any of the grounds raised.
- Citation
- [2016] ZAFSHC 115
- Parties
- Applicant: Babereki Consulting Engineers CC; Respondent: Minister: Department of Water and Sanitation; Respondent: Vharanani Properties (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Bloemwater; Respondent: Minister: Department of Human Settlements; Respondent: Premier: Free State Provincial Government; Respondent: Nketoana Local Municipality; Respondent: Setsoto Local Municipality; Respondent: Tokologo Local Municipality
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 30 June 2016
- Case Number
- 890/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Judgment and Order Dismissing Interim Interdict
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs, including wasted costs occasioned by the postponement on 3 June 2016.
- Judges
- Mokgobo, AJ
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Interim Interdict, Prima Facie Right, Service of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Babereki Consulting Engineers CC
Applicant
Minister: Department of Water and Sanitation
Respondent
Vharanani Properties (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Bloemwater
Respondent
Minister: Department of Human Settlements
Respondent
Premier: Free State Provincial Government
Respondent
Nketoana Local Municipality
Respondent
Setsoto Local Municipality
Respondent
Tokologo Local Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Judgment and Order Dismissing Interim Interdict
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant established a prima facie right to the interim interdict.
- 2 Whether the applicant demonstrated infringement of its rights by the respondents.
- 3 Whether the absence of the second respondent at the initial hearing was wilful and constituted proper service.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to make out a proper case for the granting of an interim order, as the founding affidavit did not contain sufficient averments regarding exclusive rights or the scope of works to demonstrate infringement. The absence of documentary evidence, such as the contract, rendered it impossible to conclude that a prima facie right was established. The court further held that media reports do not constitute proper service of court proceedings and rejected the argument that the second respondent's absence was wilful. The application for leave to appeal was dismissed as there were no reasonable prospects of success on any of the grounds raised.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs, including wasted costs occasioned by the postponement on 3 June 2016.
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs, including the wasted costs occasioned by the postponement on 3 June 2016.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment