Hamsa Consulting Engineers (Pty) Ltd v Sigodi Marah Martin Management Support (Pty) Ltd (32290/2020) [2023] ZAGPPHC 1187 (22 September 2023)

Hamsa Consulting Engineers (Pty) Ltd v Sigodi Marah Martin Management Support (Pty) Ltd (32290/2020) [2023] ZAGPPHC 1187 (22 September 2023)

The court considered the grounds advanced by the applicant for leave to appeal and the reasons for the original judgment. After evaluating the arguments from both parties, the court found that there are no reasonable prospects that another court would reach a different conclusion. Furthermore, the court determined that there is no compelling reason to grant leave to appeal. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs.

Citation
[2023] ZAGPPHC 1187
Parties
Respondent: Hamsa Consulting Engineers (Pty) Ltd; Applicant: Sigodi Marah Martin Management Support (Pty) Ltd
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
22 September 2023
Case Number
32290/2020
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal
Outcome
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
Millar
Legal Topics
Leave to Appeal, Costs Order
Civil Procedure Leave to Appeal Costs Order

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Hamsa Consulting Engineers (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Sigodi Marah Martin Management Support (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether leave to appeal should be granted against the judgment and order handed down on 29 August 2023.
  2. 2 Whether there are reasonable prospects that another court would come to a different conclusion.
  3. 3 Whether there is any other compelling reason for granting leave to appeal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court considered the grounds advanced by the applicant for leave to appeal and the reasons for the original judgment. After evaluating the arguments from both parties, the court found that there are no reasonable prospects that another court would reach a different conclusion. Furthermore, the court determined that there is no compelling reason to grant leave to appeal. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed with costs.

Court Disposition

Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.