Airline Pilots Association of South Africa (ALPA-SA) as represented by the South African Airways Pilots Association (SAAPA), a branch of ALPA-SA obo Members v South African Airways (SOC) Limited and Others (J398/21) [2021] ZALCJHB 159 (19 July 2021)
The court found that the applicant failed to establish any proper grounds demonstrating reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The issues raised in the application for leave to appeal had already been adequately disposed of in the main judgment. The court was not convinced that there was any compelling reason...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] ZALCJHB 159
- Parties
- Applicant: The Airline Pilots’ Association of South Africa (ALPA-SA), as represented by the South African Airways Pilots’ Association (SAAPA), a branch of ALPA-SA obo Members; Respondent: South African Airways (SOC) Limited; Respondent: Les Matuson N.O.; Respondent: Siviwe Dongwana N.O.; Respondent: The Minister of Public Enterprises N.O.
- Court
- Labour Court Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 19 July 2021
- Case Number
- J398/21
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Dismissal of Urgent Interim and Declaratory Relief.
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with no order as to costs.
- Judges
- Tlhotlhalemaje
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Reasonable Prospects of Success, Urgent Application, Costs Order
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Airline Pilots’ Association of South Africa (ALPA-SA), as represented by the South African Airways Pilots’ Association (SAAPA), a branch of ALPA-SA obo Members
Applicant
South African Airways (SOC) Limited
Respondent
Les Matuson N.O.
Respondent
Siviwe Dongwana N.O.
Respondent
The Minister of Public Enterprises N.O.
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Dismissal of Urgent Interim and Declaratory Relief.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has established reasonable prospects of success on appeal against the dismissal of its urgent application.
- 2 Whether there is any compelling reason for the appeal to be heard despite the main judgment.
- 3 Whether the application for leave to appeal meets the threshold set by section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to establish any proper grounds demonstrating reasonable prospects of success on appeal. The issues raised in the application for leave to appeal had already been adequately disposed of in the main judgment. The court was not convinced that there was any compelling reason for the appeal to be heard, nor that the applicant's case met the threshold required by section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act. Accordingly, the application for leave to appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with no order as to costs.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal is dismissed.
- There is no order as to costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment