Kosmos Ridge Homeowner's Association v Maseko and Others - Application for Leave to Appeal (30085/09) [2023] ZAGPPHC 2030 (30 November 2023)
The court found that the applicant failed to establish a reasonable prospect of success on appeal or any compelling reason for leave to appeal. The applicant's challenge was primarily against the exercise of judicial discretion, which the court held was properly and judicially exercised. The orders sought to be...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] ZAGPPHC 2030
- Parties
- Applicant: Kosmos Ridge Homeowner's Association; Respondent: Madibeng Local Municipality; Respondent: Member of the Executive Council: Local Government [North West Province]; Respondent: Minister of Water Affairs & Forestry; Respondent: SF Molokoane-Machika; Respondent: PM Mapulane; Respondent: Minister for Co-operative Governance & Traditional Affairs; Respondent: Erick Matlawe; Respondent: HD Makobe; Respondent: Mpho Poppy Magongoa; Respondent: Paul Maseko; Respondent: Paul Maseko N.O.; Respondent: Joseph Ratloi; Respondent: Noko Seaneko
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2023
- Case Number
- 30085/09
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Judgment Dated 27 March 2023
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- B.F. Mnyovu
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal Test, Judicial Discretion, Condonation, Contempt of Court, Rescission of Order
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kosmos Ridge Homeowner's Association
Applicant
Madibeng Local Municipality
Respondent
Member of the Executive Council: Local Government [North West Province]
Respondent
Minister of Water Affairs & Forestry
Respondent
SF Molokoane-Machika
Respondent
PM Mapulane
Respondent
Minister for Co-operative Governance & Traditional Affairs
Respondent
Erick Matlawe
Respondent
HD Makobe
Respondent
Mpho Poppy Magongoa
Respondent
Paul Maseko
Respondent
Paul Maseko N.O.
Respondent
Joseph Ratloi
Respondent
Noko Seaneko
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Judgment Dated 27 March 2023
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there is a reasonable prospect that the appeal would succeed in terms of Section 17 of the Superior Courts Act.
- 2 Whether the court's exercise of discretion in granting condonation for late filing of the rescission application was judicially correct.
- 3 Whether the orders sought to be enforced by the applicant were properly granted and susceptible to contempt proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to establish a reasonable prospect of success on appeal or any compelling reason for leave to appeal. The applicant's challenge was primarily against the exercise of judicial discretion, which the court held was properly and judicially exercised. The orders sought to be enforced were found to be invalid due to non-compliance with statutory and constitutional requirements, and the requirements for contempt were not met. The court emphasized the higher threshold for granting leave to appeal under Section 17 of the Superior Courts Act and concluded that the interest of justice does not warrant granting leave. The application for leave to appeal was...
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment