Uniqon Wonings (Pty) Limited v City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality (22726/2013) [2014] ZAGPPHC 1052 (13 March 2014)
The court held that the respondent municipality is not entitled to withhold clearance certificates for individual stands on the basis that rates and taxes for the entire development are unpaid. Section 118(1) of the Municipal Systems Act refers specifically to the property to be transferred, not the remainder of the development. Only registered property is subject to rates and taxes, and the municipality may not levy such charges on unsold, unregistered stands. The municipality retains security for outstanding rates and taxes through section 118(3), which provides a charge upon the property. The applicant is only required to pay the application fee for the clearance certificate for each...
- Citation
- [2014] ZAGPPHC 1052
- Parties
- Applicant: Uniqon Wonings (Pty) Limited; Respondent: City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 13 March 2014
- Case Number
- 22726/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Judgment After Urgent Application and Written Heads of Argument
- Outcome
- Application granted. Orders issued in favour of the applicant. Costs awarded against the respondent on an attorney and client scale, including costs of two counsel and heads of argument.
- Judges
- Ebersohn AJ
- Legal Topics
- Municipal Property Rates, Clearance Certificates, Statutory Interpretation, Section 118 Municipal Systems Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Uniqon Wonings (Pty) Limited
Applicant
City of Tshwane Metropolitan Municipality
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Judgment After Urgent Application and Written Heads of Argument
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent municipality is entitled to withhold clearance certificates for individual stands until rates and taxes for the entire development are paid.
- 2 Whether the municipality may levy property rates and taxes on unsold, unregistered stands in a township development.
- 3 Proper interpretation of section 118(1) of the Local Government: Municipal Systems Act 32 of 2000 regarding clearance certificates.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the respondent municipality is not entitled to withhold clearance certificates for individual stands on the basis that rates and taxes for the entire development are unpaid. Section 118(1) of the Municipal Systems Act refers specifically to the property to be transferred, not the remainder of the development. Only registered property is subject to rates and taxes, and the municipality may not levy such charges on unsold, unregistered stands. The municipality retains security for outstanding rates and taxes through section 118(3), which provides a charge upon the property. The applicant is only required to pay the application fee for the clearance certificate for each...
Court Disposition
Application granted. Orders issued in favour of the applicant. Costs awarded against the respondent on an attorney and client scale, including costs of two counsel and heads of argument.
Orders
- The matter is treated as urgent. Respondent ordered to issue clearance certificates within 7 days from judgment for Stands 163, 165, and 172 upon payment of R50.40 per stand.
- Declaratory order: Respondent is not entitled to levy property rates and taxes on unsold, unregistered stands; only on all remaining stands registered under the main title deed as one property.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment