National Credit Regulator v Triple Advanced Investments 40 (Pty) Ltd (35431/2015/140(1)) [2017] ZANCT 89 (10 July 2017)
- Citation
- [2017] ZANCT 89
- Status
- Order
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Posture
- Settlement Agreement / Final Order
- Case number
- 35431/2015/140(1)
More details
- Court
- National Consumer Tribunal
- Posture
- Settlement Agreement / Final Order
- Case number
- 35431/2015/140(1)
On this page
Professional case brief
Research organized from the available case record
01
Holding and result
The Tribunal accepted the settlement agreement between the parties, which acknowledged the Respondent's contravention of section 90(2)(k)(vi)(bb) of the National Credit Act as prohibited conduct. The Respondent undertook to provide a sworn report detailing all consumers affected by judgments and emolument attachment orders obtained on the strength of the unlawful consent, to supply information regarding the sale of its loan book, and to confirm non-enforcement of emolument attachment orders since 2013. The Respondent further agreed to cease the practice of obtaining consents to jurisdiction outside the consumer's area and confirmed it would no longer operate as a credit provider. The Tribunal made the settlement agreement an order, bringing final resolution to the matter.
Court disposition
Settlement agreement made an order of the Tribunal; Respondent's conduct declared prohibited; Respondent undertakes to provide reports and cease prohibited practices.
Orders
- The settlement agreement is made an order of the National Consumer Tribunal.
- The Respondent's contravention of section 90(2)(k)(vi)(bb) is declared prohibited conduct.
- Within 60 days, the Respondent must provide the Applicant with a sworn report detailing all consumers affected by judgments and emolument attachment orders obtained on the strength of the unlawful consent.
- The Respondent must provide information regarding the sale of its loan book for affected consumers.
- The Respondent must confirm in writing that it has not enforced emolument attachment orders since 2013.
- The Respondent undertakes not to obtain consents to jurisdiction outside the consumer's area in the future.
- The Respondent confirms it is no longer operating as a credit provider and will not do so in the future.
- Each party will settle its own legal costs and no further claims will be made in this regard.
02
Material facts
Parties
National Credit Regulator
ApplicantTriple Advanced Investment 40 (Pty) Ltd
RespondentAmounts and remedies
- Administrative Fine Sought: ZAR 1,000,000
03
Procedural history
Posture
Settlement Agreement / Final Order
04
Questions and positions
Legal issues
- 01
Whether the Respondent included unlawful provisions in credit agreements contrary to the National Credit Act.
- 02
Whether the Respondent induced consumers to consent to jurisdiction outside their area of residence or work.
- 03
Whether the Respondent's conduct constitutes prohibited conduct under the Act.
Party arguments
- Applicant
- The Applicant alleged that the Respondent required consumers to sign consents to judgment and emolument attachment orders, which constitute credit agreements containing unlawful provisions under section 90(1) read with section 90(2)(k)(vi)(bb) of the National Credit Act. Alternatively, the Respondent induced consumers to enter into supplementary agreements consenting to jurisdiction of courts outside their area of residence, contravening section 91(a). The Applicant sought declaratory and interdictory relief, an audit, and an administrative fine.
- Respondent
- The Respondent agreed to settle the matter, acknowledged the contravention of section 90(2)(k)(vi)(bb), undertook to provide the required reports and information, confirmed cessation of enforcement of emolument attachment orders since 2013, and committed not to engage in the prohibited practices or operate as a credit provider in the future.
05
Court’s reasoning
Legal principles
- 01
Section 90(1) and 90(2)(k)(vi)(bb) of the National Credit Act, 34 of 2005
A credit agreement must not contain provisions that are unlawful or contrary to the National Credit Act, including clauses that improperly restrict consumer rights or jurisdiction.
- 02
Section 91(a) of the National Credit Act, 34 of 2005
A credit provider may not induce a consumer to consent to the jurisdiction of a court outside the consumer's area of residence, work, or where the goods are kept.
06
Ratio, limits and disposition
Ratio decidendi
The Tribunal accepted the settlement agreement between the parties, which acknowledged the Respondent's contravention of section 90(2)(k)(vi)(bb) of the National Credit Act as prohibited conduct. The Respondent undertook to provide a sworn report detailing all consumers affected by judgments and emolument attachment orders obtained on the strength of the unlawful consent, to supply information regarding the sale of its loan book, and to confirm non-enforcement of emolument attachment orders since 2013. The Respondent further agreed to cease the practice of obtaining consents to jurisdiction outside the consumer's area and confirmed it would no longer operate as a credit provider. The Tribunal made the settlement agreement an order, bringing final resolution to the matter.
Obiter and limits
- The Tribunal encourages parties to resolve disputes in a spirit of mutual cooperation and understanding.
- The cessation of prohibited practices and the Respondent's withdrawal from credit provision serve the interests of consumer protection.
Court disposition
Settlement agreement made an order of the Tribunal; Respondent's conduct declared prohibited; Respondent undertakes to provide reports and cease prohibited practices.
- The settlement agreement is made an order of the National Consumer Tribunal.
- The Respondent's contravention of section 90(2)(k)(vi)(bb) is declared prohibited conduct.
- Within 60 days, the Respondent must provide the Applicant with a sworn report detailing all consumers affected by judgments and emolument attachment orders obtained on the strength of the unlawful consent.
- The Respondent must provide information regarding the sale of its loan book for affected consumers.
- The Respondent must confirm in writing that it has not enforced emolument attachment orders since 2013.
- The Respondent undertakes not to obtain consents to jurisdiction outside the consumer's area in the future.
- The Respondent confirms it is no longer operating as a credit provider and will not do so in the future.
- Each party will settle its own legal costs and no further claims will be made in this regard.
Source and reliance status
National Consumer Tribunal
This page organises the available record for research. Confirm quotations, current status, and subsequent treatment against the official source before relying on the case.
Judgment reading view
Judgment text
The complete available source text.
National Consumer Tribunal
Order
IN
THE NATIONAL CONSUMER TRIBUNAL
HELD
AT CENTURION
Case number: 35431/2015/140(1)
In the matter between:
THE
NATIONAL CREDIT
REGULATOR
APPLICANT
and
TRIPLE ADVANCED INVESTMENT 40 (PTY)
LTD
RESPONDENT
SETTLEMENT
AGREEMENT
WHEREAS:
1. The National Credit Regulator ("the Applicant") has instituted proceedings in the National Consumer Tribunal held at
Centurion against Triple Advanced Investment 40 (Pty) Ltd ("the Respondent") under case number NCT/35431/2015/140(1).
2. The basis of the Applicant's referral is that:
2.1 the Respondent directly or indirectly, requires or induces or causes consumers to sign a document titled "CONSENT TO JUDGEMENT IN TERMS OF SECTION 58 AND CONSENT TO AN EMOLUMENT ATTACHMENT ORDER IN
TERMS OF SECTION 65J OF THE MAGISTRATE'S COURT ACT, 32 OF 1944."
2.2 the consent constitutes a credit agreement as envisaged in section 8(4)(f) of the Act of the Act, accordingly the Respondent has included an unlawful provision in a credit agreement thus contravening Section 90(1) of the Act read with Section 90(2)(k)(vi)(bb) of the Act.
2.3 in the alternative, the Respondent directly or indirectly, required or induced consumers to enter into a supplementary agreement wherein consumers consents to the jurisdiction of a Court which is situated outside the area of jurisdiction of a court having concurrent jurisdiction and in which the consumer does not reside or work or where the goods (the subject matter of the credit agreement) are ordinarily kept thus contravening Section 91(a) read with Section 90(2)(k)(vi)(bb) of the Act.
3. An order was soughtin the following terms:-
a) Declaring the Respondent to be in repeated contraventions of the following Sections of the National Credit Act, 34 of 2005 ("the Act");
i. Contravention of Section 90(1) read with Section 90(2)(k)(vi)(bb) of the Act; or
ii. Contravention of Section 91(a) read with Section 90(2)(k)(vi)(bb).
b. Declaring the Respondent's contraventions of the above provisions of the Act and conditions of registration, prohibited conduct.
c. Ordering the Respondent to provide the Applicant with an audit report within 90 days of the order, compiled by an independent auditor at the Respondent's expense, detailing:-
i. All consumers where the Respondent has obtained judgments and subsequent emolument attachment orders on the strength of the “Consent”; and
ii. The amounts collected from each consumer's salary through the emolument attachment orders that were issued as a consequence of judgments obtained on the strength of the "Consent".
d. Interdicting the Respondent or its successor in title or its assignee from collecting any payments from consumers' salaries through the emolument attachment orders that were issued as a consequence of judgments obtained on the strength of the “Consent”.
e. Imposing an Administrative fine in the amount of R1 million or 10% of the Respondent's annual turnover.
f. In terms of section 150(i), making any other appropriate order required to give effect to the consumers' rights in terms of the Act.
NOW THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the parties are now desirous of settling this matterin the spirit of mutual co-operation and understanding as well as engaging with
each other in
the future on an amicable and cooperative basis.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties record the terms and conditions of settlement as follows:
1. The parties agree that this settlement agreement be made an order of the National Consumer Tribunal.
2. That the Applicant has contravened Section 90(2)(k)(vi)(bb) and that such contravention is declared prohibited conduct.
3. Within 60 days from the date of this settlement agreement:
a. The Respondent will provide the Applicant with a report, under oath, detailing all consumers where the Respondent has obtained judgments and subsequent emolument attachment orders on the strength of the “Consent”.
b. The Respondent will provide to the Applicant any and all information relating to the sale of the Respondent's loan book in regard to the consumers listed in the aforesaid report.
c. The Respondent will provide written confirmation that the Respondent hasn't enforced on the Emolument Attachment Orders since 2013.
4. The Respondent undertakes that they will not proceed with the practice of obtaining consents to jurisdiction which is situated outside the area of jurisdiction of a court having concurrent jurisdiction and in which the consumer does not reside or work or where the goods are kept, in the future.
5. The Respondent confirms that the Respondent is no longer operating as a credit provider nor will the Respondent conduct the business of a credit provider in the future.
6. This settlement will constitute final settlement between the parties of the aforesaid matter at the National Consumer Tribunal.
7. Each party to this settlement agreement agrees to settle their own legal costs incurred in this matter and no further claims will be made in this regard.
SIGNED at PRETORIA ON 10th JULY 2017
_______
TRIPLE ADVANCED INVESTMENT 40 (PTY) LTD
For and behalf of the Respondent
SIGNED at PRETORIA on 10JULY2017.
NATIONAL
CREDIT REGULATOR
For and on behalf of the Respondent
Case-aware research
Ask AI about this case
The judgment and available research above are public. New questions open in a separate private conversation grounded in this case.