Escarpment Environment Protection Group and Another v Department of Water Affairs and Another (WT 03/06/2010) [2011] ZAWT 13 (21 July 2011)
The Tribunal held that only objectors who responded to a public notice under section 41(4) of the National Water Act have standing to appeal to the Tribunal under section 148(1)(f). The appellants lodged unsolicited written objections, but no public notice was issued. A strict, literal interpretation of the relevant provisions does not offend the Constitution and is consistent with legislative intent. Extending standing to other objectors would amount to judicial overreach and is not supported by the Constitution or the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act. The Tribunal found that the appellants are not the kind of objectors contemplated by the Act and are therefore non-suited to bring...
- Citation
- [2011] ZAWT 13
- Parties
- Appellant: Escarpment Environment Protection Group; Appellant: Wonderfontein Environmental Committee; Respondent: Department of Water Affairs; Respondent: Exxaro Coal (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Water Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2011
- Case Number
- WT 03/06/2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Ruling on Locus Standi
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed for lack of standing.
- Judges
- LJ Lekale, H Thompson, A.S Makhanya
- Legal Topics
- National Water Act, Locus Standi, Internal Appeal Rights, Public Participation, Promotion of Administrative Justice Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Escarpment Environment Protection Group
Appellant
Wonderfontein Environmental Committee
Appellant
Department of Water Affairs
Respondent
Exxaro Coal (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Ruling on Locus Standi
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellants have locus standi to lodge the present appeal under section 148(1)(f) of the National Water Act.
- 2 Whether the absence of a public notice under section 41(4) of the National Water Act affects the appellants' right to appeal.
- 3 Whether a strict or liberal interpretation of the National Water Act is constitutionally required.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal held that only objectors who responded to a public notice under section 41(4) of the National Water Act have standing to appeal to the Tribunal under section 148(1)(f). The appellants lodged unsolicited written objections, but no public notice was issued. A strict, literal interpretation of the relevant provisions does not offend the Constitution and is consistent with legislative intent. Extending standing to other objectors would amount to judicial overreach and is not supported by the Constitution or the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act. The Tribunal found that the appellants are not the kind of objectors contemplated by the Act and are therefore non-suited to bring...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed for lack of standing.
Orders
- The appellants have no standing to lodge the present appeal.
- The appeal is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment