Nomna v Williams and Others; Nomna v Williams and Others (3603/2019) [2020] ZAFSHC 62 (6 March 2020)
The court found that the applicant failed to make out a case for the relief sought in application 3603/2019, as the relevant operating licence had already been transferred to Mfazwe and no review of the Board’s decision was sought. In application 2440/2019, the applicant was entitled to become the owner of licence 48486/1, and the Board had already effected transfer. The respondent’s explanations for signing transfer documents were rejected as improbable and untruthful. The defence of prescription was dismissed, as the respondent’s conduct interrupted prescription and he failed to prove when the debt became due. The court held that it would be futile to order respondent to sign documents...
- Citation
- [2020] ZAFSHC 62
- Parties
- Applicant: Vuyolwethu Nomna; Respondent: Jonny Simon Williams; Respondent: Matyaleni Jacob Mfazwe; Respondent: The Chairperson of the Free State Operating Licensing Board; Respondent: Greater Bloemfontein Taxi Association
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 6 March 2020
- Case Number
- 3603/2019
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Opposed Motion; Judgment After Oral Argument
- Outcome
- Application 3603/2019 dismissed with costs; application 2440/2019 partially granted with declaratory relief and costs orders as specified.
- Judges
- JP Daffue
- Legal Topics
- Operating Licence Transfer, Sale Vs Lease Agreement, Prescription, Rescission of Judgment, Declaratory Relief
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Vuyolwethu Nomna
Applicant
Jonny Simon Williams
Respondent
Matyaleni Jacob Mfazwe
Respondent
The Chairperson of the Free State Operating Licensing Board
Respondent
Greater Bloemfontein Taxi Association
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Opposed Motion; Judgment After Oral Argument
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether agreements of sale were entered into between applicant and respondent regarding two operating licences.
- 2 Whether the purchase price for each operating licence was paid.
- 3 Whether the agreements of sale were cancelled and replaced by lease agreements as alleged by respondent.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to make out a case for the relief sought in application 3603/2019, as the relevant operating licence had already been transferred to Mfazwe and no review of the Board’s decision was sought. In application 2440/2019, the applicant was entitled to become the owner of licence 48486/1, and the Board had already effected transfer. The respondent’s explanations for signing transfer documents were rejected as improbable and untruthful. The defence of prescription was dismissed, as the respondent’s conduct interrupted prescription and he failed to prove when the debt became due. The court held that it would be futile to order respondent to sign documents...
Court Disposition
Application 3603/2019 dismissed with costs; application 2440/2019 partially granted with declaratory relief and costs orders as specified.
Orders
- Prayers 1–3 of the Notice of Motion in application 2440/2019 are dismissed.
- It is declared that applicant was entitled to become the lawful owner of operating licence LFSLB48486/1 and that the Board was entitled to approve transfer of the said licence to applicant on 28 September 2018.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment