HT Pelatona Projects (Pty) Ltd v Tswelopele Local Municipality and Others (2214/2022) [2022] ZAFSHC 97 (23 May 2022)

HT Pelatona Projects (Pty) Ltd v Tswelopele Local Municipality and Others (2214/2022) [2022] ZAFSHC 97 (23 May 2022)

The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie right to interim relief, as the tender was awarded to a joint venture that did not meet the mandatory CIDB grading requirements for both civil and mechanical engineering. The evidence presented by the applicant was not disputed by the respondents, and the Bid Evaluation Committee failed to consider relevant technical reports and mandatory requirements. The urgency of the matter was accepted, given the imminent implementation of the works and the delays attributable to the first respondent. The court held that irreparable harm would result if interim relief was not granted, as the contract works might be completed before the...

Citation
[2022] ZAFSHC 97
Parties
Applicant: HT Pelatona Projects (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Tswelopele Local Municipality; Respondent: NSM Professional Services and General Projects (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Tamane Civil Construction (Pty) Ltd
Court
Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
23 May 2022
Case Number
2214/2022
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Interim Interdict Pending Review Application
Outcome
Interim interdict granted; respondents interdicted from implementing the tender award pending review application; costs reserved.
Judges
JP Daffue
Legal Topics
Public Procurement, Interim Interdict, Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act, Municipal Tender Award, Bid Evaluation, Urgency in Interdicts

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 19 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

HT Pelatona Projects (Pty) Ltd

Applicant

Tswelopele Local Municipality

Respondent

NSM Professional Services and General Projects (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Tamane Civil Construction (Pty) Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Urgent Application / Interim Interdict Pending Review Application

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an interim interdict restraining implementation of the tender award pending review.
  2. 2 Whether the tender process complied with statutory and regulatory requirements, including CIDB grading.
  3. 3 Whether the application is urgent and meets the requirements for interim relief.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had established a prima facie right to interim relief, as the tender was awarded to a joint venture that did not meet the mandatory CIDB grading requirements for both civil and mechanical engineering. The evidence presented by the applicant was not disputed by the respondents, and the Bid Evaluation Committee failed to consider relevant technical reports and mandatory requirements. The urgency of the matter was accepted, given the imminent implementation of the works and the delays attributable to the first respondent. The court held that irreparable harm would result if interim relief was not granted, as the contract works might be completed before the...

Court Disposition

Interim interdict granted; respondents interdicted from implementing the tender award pending review application; costs reserved.

Orders

  • The applicant's non-compliance with the rules of court is condoned and the application is heard as a matter of urgency in terms of Rule 6(12).
  • Pending final adjudication of a review application to be instituted on or before 27 May 2022, the respondents are interdicted and restrained from implementing or acting upon the decision to award the public tender SCM/TSW/11/2021-2022:Bultfontein/Phahameng Refurbishment of Sewer Pumpstation to the joint venture of...