Coca Cola Sabco (Pty) Limited v Van Wyk (JA11/2013) [2015] ZALAC 15; [2015] 8 BLLR 774 (LAC); (2015) 36 ILJ 2013 (LAC) (5 May 2015)
A reinstatement award under the Labour Relations Act revives the contract of employment from the date specified in the award, but does not entitle the employee to remuneration for the period between the date of the award and its actual implementation unless the employee tenders services and pursues a separate...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] ZALAC 15
- Parties
- Appellant: Coca Cola Sabco (Pty) Limited; Respondent: Harold Van Wyk
- Court
- Labour Appeal Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 5 May 2015
- Case Number
- JA11/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Labour Court Judgment Regarding Writ of Execution Following Reinstatement Award
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld. Paragraph 2 of the Labour Court's judgment is deleted. No order as to costs.
- Judges
- Musi JA, Murphy, Kathree-Setiloane AJJA
- Legal Topics
- Reinstatement Award, Writ of Execution, Contractual Claim for Remuneration, Unfair Dismissal
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Coca Cola Sabco (Pty) Limited
Appellant
Harold Van Wyk
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal Against Labour Court Judgment Regarding Writ of Execution Following Reinstatement Award
Legal Issues
- 1 Does a reinstatement award entitle an employee to remuneration for the period between the date of the award and its implementation?
- 2 Can such remuneration be claimed by way of a writ of execution accompanied by an affidavit before the registrar?
Ratio Decidendi
A reinstatement award under the Labour Relations Act revives the contract of employment from the date specified in the award, but does not entitle the employee to remuneration for the period between the date of the award and its actual implementation unless the employee tenders services and pursues a separate contractual claim. The Labour Court erred in holding that such remuneration could be claimed by way of a writ of execution accompanied by affidavit before the registrar. The correct procedure is for the employee to institute a contractual claim, setting out the basis for entitlement and allowing the employer to raise contractual defences. Only after adjudication of such a claim does...
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld. Paragraph 2 of the Labour Court's judgment is deleted. No order as to costs.
Orders
- The appeal is upheld.
- Paragraph 2 of the court a quo’s judgment is deleted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment