Minister of Justice and Correctional Service and Another v Mmela Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd (46825/2017) [2017] ZAGPPHC 695 (24 October 2017)
The court found that exceptional circumstances exist due to the ongoing prejudice to the Department and the public, who are denied access to court files and documents necessary for the administration of justice. The applicants demonstrated irreparable harm in failing their constitutional mandate and public service obligations, while the respondent failed to substantiate any irreparable harm it would suffer if the order remained in operation. The balance of convenience and justice favoured the applicants, and the requirements of section 18 of the Superior Courts Act were met. Therefore, the order granted on 2 August 2017 should remain effective and enforceable pending any petition or appeal.
- Citation
- [2017] ZAGPPHC 695
- Parties
- Applicant: Minister of Justice and Correctional Service; Applicant: Director General of the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development; Respondent: Mmela Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 24 October 2017
- Case Number
- 46825/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Section 18 Application Following Refusal of Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application granted. The order of 2 August 2017 remains effective and enforceable pending any petition or appeal. The respondent is ordered to comply within 48 hours and to pay the costs of the application, including costs of two counsel.
- Judges
- C Pretorius
- Legal Topics
- Section 18 Application, Leave to Execute Pending Appeal, Irreparable Harm, Exceptional Circumstances, Public Interest Access to Courts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Minister of Justice and Correctional Service
Applicant
Director General of the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development
Applicant
Mmela Investment Holdings (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Section 18 Application Following Refusal of Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether exceptional circumstances exist justifying the order to remain in operation pending any petition or appeal.
- 2 Whether the applicants will suffer irreparable harm if the order is suspended during appeal processes.
- 3 Whether the respondent will suffer irreparable harm if the order remains in operation.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that exceptional circumstances exist due to the ongoing prejudice to the Department and the public, who are denied access to court files and documents necessary for the administration of justice. The applicants demonstrated irreparable harm in failing their constitutional mandate and public service obligations, while the respondent failed to substantiate any irreparable harm it would suffer if the order remained in operation. The balance of convenience and justice favoured the applicants, and the requirements of section 18 of the Superior Courts Act were met. Therefore, the order granted on 2 August 2017 should remain effective and enforceable pending any petition or appeal.
Court Disposition
Application granted. The order of 2 August 2017 remains effective and enforceable pending any petition or appeal. The respondent is ordered to comply within 48 hours and to pay the costs of the application, including costs of two counsel.
Orders
- The order granted on 2 August 2017 under case number 46825/2017 is declared effective and enforceable pending petition and, if leave to appeal is granted, pending any appeal.
- The respondent is ordered to comply with the order handed down on 2 August 2017 within 48 hours of the grant of this order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment