De Vries Ambulance Academy (Pty) Ltd v Professional Board for Emergency Care and Another (93357/2016) [2017] ZAGPPHC 453 (28 April 2017)
The court found that the applicant had established exceptional circumstances justifying the continued operation of the interim order pending the outcome of the application for leave to appeal or any subsequent appeal. The applicant's longstanding provision of accredited training, the risk of closure, job losses, and prejudice to students constituted harm that was out of the ordinary and could not be adequately remedied in due course. The respondents' regulatory harm was found to be minimal, given their delayed exercise of regulatory powers and the absence of immediate prejudice. The court held that urgency was sufficiently established and that the balance of convenience favoured the...
- Citation
- [2017] ZAGPPHC 453
- Parties
- Applicant: De Vries Ambulance Academy (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Professional Board for Emergency Care; Respondent: Health Professions Council of South Africa
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2017
- Case Number
- 93357/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Order That Previous Interim Order Remains Effective Pending Leave to Appeal or Appeal
- Outcome
- Application granted. The interim order of Tolmay J remains effective pending leave to appeal or appeal.
- Judges
- SA Thobane
- Legal Topics
- Stay of Execution, Exceptional Circumstances, Irreparable Harm, Interim Relief, Regulatory Functions
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
De Vries Ambulance Academy (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Professional Board for Emergency Care
Respondent
Health Professions Council of South Africa
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Order That Previous Interim Order Remains Effective Pending Leave to Appeal or Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has established exceptional circumstances justifying the continued operation of the interim order pending leave to appeal or appeal.
- 2 Whether the applicant will suffer irreparable harm if the interim order is suspended.
- 3 Whether the respondents will suffer irreparable harm if the interim order remains effective.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had established exceptional circumstances justifying the continued operation of the interim order pending the outcome of the application for leave to appeal or any subsequent appeal. The applicant's longstanding provision of accredited training, the risk of closure, job losses, and prejudice to students constituted harm that was out of the ordinary and could not be adequately remedied in due course. The respondents' regulatory harm was found to be minimal, given their delayed exercise of regulatory powers and the absence of immediate prejudice. The court held that urgency was sufficiently established and that the balance of convenience favoured the...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The interim order of Tolmay J remains effective pending leave to appeal or appeal.
Orders
- Pending the respondents' application for leave to appeal, or an appeal (if granted), the order of Tolmay J dated 30 March 2017 shall remain effective.
- The respondents are directed to pay the costs of the application jointly and severally, including costs consequent upon the employment of two counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment