Inzalo Enterprise Management Systems (PTY) Ltd v Mogale City Local Municipality and Others (2022/12127) [2022] ZAGPJHC 821 (7 October 2022)
The court found that the applicant had established exceptional circumstances as required by section 18 of the Superior Courts Act. The municipality's ongoing unlawful conduct and disregard for procurement policies and the Constitution justified the lifting of the automatic suspension of the 14 June 2022 order. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] ZAGPJHC 821
- Parties
- Applicant: Inzalo Enterprise Management Systems (PTY) Ltd; Respondent: Mogale City Local Municipality; Respondent: Makhosana Msezana N.O; Respondent: Makhosana Msezana
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 7 October 2022
- Case Number
- 2022/12127
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Implementation of Order Pending Outcome of Leave to Appeal or Appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Application granted; the operation and execution of the 14 June 2022 order is not suspended pending any application for leave to appeal or appeal.
- Judges
- Molahlehi
- Legal Topics
- Superior Courts Act Section 18, Exceptional Circumstances, Irreparable Harm, Authority to Defend, Condonation of Late Filing
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Inzalo Enterprise Management Systems (PTY) Ltd
Applicant
Mogale City Local Municipality
Respondent
Makhosana Msezana N.O
Respondent
Makhosana Msezana
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Implementation of Order Pending Outcome of Leave to Appeal or Appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the operation and execution of the 14 June 2022 order should be suspended pending the outcome of leave to appeal or appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal.
- 2 Whether the applicant has established exceptional circumstances and irreparable harm as required by section 18 of the Superior Courts Act.
- 3 Whether the municipal manager had authority to defend and depose to the answering affidavit.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had established exceptional circumstances as required by section 18 of the Superior Courts Act. The municipality's ongoing unlawful conduct and disregard for procurement policies and the Constitution justified the lifting of the automatic suspension of the 14 June 2022 order. The applicant demonstrated that irreparable harm would result if the order was suspended, while the municipality failed to provide sufficient evidence of any irreparable harm it would suffer if the order was implemented. The court also held that the municipal manager had authority to defend and depose to the answering affidavit, and condoned the late filing of the answering...
Court Disposition
Application granted; the operation and execution of the 14 June 2022 order is not suspended pending any application for leave to appeal or appeal.
Orders
- The late filing of the answering affidavit is condoned.
- The second respondent has the authority to defend and prosecute the defence against the application on behalf of the second respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment