Madullammoho Housing Association (Pty) Ltd v Mbambo and Others (2016.16069) [2016] ZAGPJHC 276 (28 June 2016)
The court found that the respondents' conduct in forcibly reoccupying the property, obstructing the Sheriff, and refusing to pay rentals constituted exceptional circumstances under section 18 of the Superior Courts Act. The applicant, a non-profit social housing provider, faces irreparable harm due to substantial financial losses, inability to maintain its housing portfolio, and risk of collapse of its projects. The respondents, having withheld rental and failed to demonstrate inability to secure alternative accommodation, are the authors of their own predicament. The court concluded that the applicant proved exceptional circumstances and irreparable harm, while the respondents failed to...
- Citation
- [2016] ZAGPJHC 276
- Parties
- Applicant: Madullammoho Housing Association (Pty) Ltd; Respondent: Mbambo, Ayanda and 56 Others as reflected 1st to 57th Respondents on Annexure “A” to the Notice of Motion
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 28 June 2016
- Case Number
- 2016/16069
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Application for Interlocutory Order Under S 18(1) and 18(3) of the Superior Courts Act Pending Leave to Appeal
- Outcome
- Application granted. The spoliation order is declared effective and enforceable pending finalisation of the application for leave to appeal and any subsequent appeal.
- Judges
- F Kathree-Setiloane
- Legal Topics
- Superior Courts Act Section 18, Spoliation, Urgent Interdict, Prevention of Illegal Eviction Act, Rental Boycott
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Madullammoho Housing Association (Pty) Ltd
Applicant
Mbambo, Ayanda and 56 Others as reflected 1st to 57th Respondents on Annexure “A” to the Notice of Motion
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Application for Interlocutory Order Under S 18(1) and 18(3) of the Superior Courts Act Pending Leave to Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether exceptional circumstances exist to justify enforcement of the spoliation order pending appeal.
- 2 Whether the applicant will suffer irreparable harm if the order is not enforced.
- 3 Whether the respondents will suffer irreparable harm if the order is enforced.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the respondents' conduct in forcibly reoccupying the property, obstructing the Sheriff, and refusing to pay rentals constituted exceptional circumstances under section 18 of the Superior Courts Act. The applicant, a non-profit social housing provider, faces irreparable harm due to substantial financial losses, inability to maintain its housing portfolio, and risk of collapse of its projects. The respondents, having withheld rental and failed to demonstrate inability to secure alternative accommodation, are the authors of their own predicament. The court concluded that the applicant proved exceptional circumstances and irreparable harm, while the respondents failed to...
Court Disposition
Application granted. The spoliation order is declared effective and enforceable pending finalisation of the application for leave to appeal and any subsequent appeal.
Orders
- The order of Fisher AJ under case number 2016/16069 is declared to be effective and enforceable pending finalisation of the application for leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Appeal, and if leave is granted by the Supreme Court of Appeal, pending the finalisation of that appeal or any subsequent appeal.
- The Respondents are ordered to pay the costs of this application jointly and severally, the one paying the other to be absolved.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment