Heymans v Van Tonder (2) (406/83) [1985] ZASCA 44; [1985] 2 All SA 389 (A) (29 May 1985)

Heymans v Van Tonder (2) (406/83) [1985] ZASCA 44; [1985] 2 All SA 389 (A) (29 May 1985)

The court held that the testamentary clause did not grant the appellant an immediate right to payment upon the remarriage of the surviving spouse. Instead, the surviving spouse was given a choice to either pay or secure the appellant's interest, with the timing of payment left to the spouse's discretion. The nature of the bequest was a conditional fideicommissum, and the appellant's entitlement to the estate would only arise upon the death of the surviving spouse unless the spouse opted to pay earlier. The requirement for security was intended to protect the appellant's interest, but did not necessitate that the security be interest-bearing. The testators' clear intention was to benefit...

Citation
[1985] ZASCA 44
Parties
Appellant: Paul Jacobus Heymans; Respondent: Beatrice Aletta van Tonder
Court
Supreme Court of Appeal
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
29 May 1985
Case Number
406/83
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Lower Court Judgment
Outcome
The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Judges
Rabie, Jansen, Joubert, Viljoen, Hefer
Legal Topics
Testamentary Interpretation, Fideicommissum, Conditional Bequest
Family and Children Land and Property Testamentary Interpretation Fideicommissum Conditional Bequest

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Paul Jacobus Heymans

Appellant

Beatrice Aletta van Tonder

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Lower Court Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the testamentary clause created a right for the appellant to immediate payment upon the remarriage of the surviving spouse.
  2. 2 Whether the surviving spouse had a choice to pay or merely secure the appellant's interest in the estate upon remarriage.
  3. 3 Whether the security provided to the appellant must be interest-bearing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the testamentary clause did not grant the appellant an immediate right to payment upon the remarriage of the surviving spouse. Instead, the surviving spouse was given a choice to either pay or secure the appellant's interest, with the timing of payment left to the spouse's discretion. The nature of the bequest was a conditional fideicommissum, and the appellant's entitlement to the estate would only arise upon the death of the surviving spouse unless the spouse opted to pay earlier. The requirement for security was intended to protect the appellant's interest, but did not necessitate that the security be interest-bearing. The testators' clear intention was to benefit...

Court Disposition

The appeal is dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • The appellant is ordered to pay the costs of the appeal.