Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd (Rustenburg Section) v Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JA17/02) [2003] ZALAC 6; [2003] 7 BLLR 676 (LAC) (23 May 2003)

Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd (Rustenburg Section) v Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JA17/02) [2003] ZALAC 6; [2003] 7 BLLR 676 (LAC) (23 May 2003)

The Labour Appeal Court found that, although the arbitrator's reasoning contained errors and some findings were irrational, the result of the arbitration was justifiable on the evidence. The employees' conduct in refusing to leave the field was serious and placed safety at risk, but mitigating factors existed, including lack of prior knowledge of the rule, emotional circumstances, and severe punishment already imposed by the tournament committee. The sanction of dismissal was disproportionate given these factors and the compensatory award and lifetime bans were sufficient punishment. The appeal was dismissed as there was no basis to interfere with the arbitration award.

Citation
[2003] ZALAC 6
Parties
Appellant: Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd (Rustenburg Section); Respondent: Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: Mafalo, ER, N.O.; Respondent: Tlapu, BS; Respondent: Jolivaba, A; Respondent: Maseko, D
Court
Labour Appeal Court
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
23 May 2003
Case Number
JA17/02
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment Dismissing Review Application of Arbitration Award
Outcome
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Judges
E L Goldstein, R M M Zondo, A N Jappie
Legal Topics
Unfair Dismissal, Disciplinary Sanctions, Review of Arbitration Award, Parity Principle
Labour Law Civil Procedure Unfair Dismissal Disciplinary Sanctions Review of Arbitration Award Parity Principle

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd (Rustenburg Section)

Appellant

Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration

Respondent

Mafalo, ER, N.O.

Respondent

Tlapu, BS

Respondent

Jolivaba, A

Respondent

Maseko, D

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Appeal From Labour Court Judgment Dismissing Review Application of Arbitration Award

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the dismissal of the employees was substantively fair given the circumstances of the misconduct.
  2. 2 Whether the arbitration award was justifiable on the evidence and correct in law.
  3. 3 Whether the sanction of dismissal was appropriate or too harsh under the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The Labour Appeal Court found that, although the arbitrator's reasoning contained errors and some findings were irrational, the result of the arbitration was justifiable on the evidence. The employees' conduct in refusing to leave the field was serious and placed safety at risk, but mitigating factors existed, including lack of prior knowledge of the rule, emotional circumstances, and severe punishment already imposed by the tournament committee. The sanction of dismissal was disproportionate given these factors and the compensatory award and lifetime bans were sufficient punishment. The appeal was dismissed as there was no basis to interfere with the arbitration award.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed with costs.
  • No order is made altering the arbitration award.