Independent Newspapers (Pty) Ltd t/a Independent Newspapers Kwazulu-Natal v Statutory Council for the Printing, Newspaper & Packaging Industries and Others (D161/08) [2009] ZALC 254 (4 December 2009)
The court found that the Second Respondent misdirected himself by treating the dismissal as one for incapacity rather than misconduct, contrary to the basis upon which the disciplinary enquiry and arbitration were conducted. The parties presented their cases on the basis of misconduct, and there was agreement that procedural fairness was not in issue. The Second Respondent's reasoning in distinguishing the Third Respondent's case from similar cases was illogical and unreasonable. Consequently, the award was one that a reasonable decision maker could not reach, warranting review and setting aside of the award.
- Citation
- [2009] ZALC 254
- Parties
- Applicant: Independent Newspapers (Pty) Ltd t/a Independent Newspapers Kwazulu-Natal; Respondent: Statutory Council for the Printing, Newspaper & Packaging Industries; Respondent: B Mngoma N.O.; Respondent: Skhumbuzo Miya
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 4 December 2009
- Case Number
- D161/08
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- The arbitration award of the Second Respondent is reviewed and set aside. The dispute is referred back to the First Respondent for determination by a commissioner other than the Second Respondent.
- Judges
- Conradie AJ
- Legal Topics
- Unfair Dismissal, Misconduct, Review of Arbitration Award, Procedural Fairness
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Independent Newspapers (Pty) Ltd t/a Independent Newspapers Kwazulu-Natal
Applicant
Statutory Council for the Printing, Newspaper & Packaging Industries
Respondent
B Mngoma N.O.
Respondent
Skhumbuzo Miya
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Second Respondent misdirected himself by treating the dismissal as one for incapacity rather than misconduct.
- 2 Whether the arbitration award was one that a reasonable decision maker could reach.
- 3 Whether the dismissal of the Third Respondent for publishing a fictitious story constituted misconduct.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the Second Respondent misdirected himself by treating the dismissal as one for incapacity rather than misconduct, contrary to the basis upon which the disciplinary enquiry and arbitration were conducted. The parties presented their cases on the basis of misconduct, and there was agreement that procedural fairness was not in issue. The Second Respondent's reasoning in distinguishing the Third Respondent's case from similar cases was illogical and unreasonable. Consequently, the award was one that a reasonable decision maker could not reach, warranting review and setting aside of the award.
Court Disposition
The arbitration award of the Second Respondent is reviewed and set aside. The dispute is referred back to the First Respondent for determination by a commissioner other than the Second Respondent.
Orders
- The decision of the Second Respondent is reviewed and set aside.
- The dispute is referred back to the First Respondent for determination by a commissioner other than the Second Respondent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment