Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA) v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR 1425/2022) [2025] ZALCJHB 1 (9 January 2025)

Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA) v Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration and Others (JR 1425/2022) [2025] ZALCJHB 1 (9 January 2025)

The court found that the Commissioner erred by relying solely on the 80% target stated in the foreword of the APP, without considering the full context and contents of the APP and STRAT Plan. The evidence showed that the 80% figure referred to a five-year improvement goal, not the annual target for 2019/2020. The correct target for the relevant year was 90%, which was not met. Therefore, the employees were not entitled to performance bonuses for that year. The Commissioner’s award was unreasonable and unsustainable on the evidence, warranting review and substitution. The payment of a once-off gratuity was made in accordance with the discretion provided in the policy, and the absence of...

Citation
[2025] ZALCJHB 1
Parties
Applicant: Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA); Respondent: Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration; Respondent: Commissioner Dheliwe Mavuma N.O; Respondent: NEHAWU obo Members
Court
Labour Court Johannesburg
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
9 January 2025
Case Number
JR 1425/2022
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment on Opposed Review Application
Outcome
Application for review granted; arbitration award set aside and substituted.
Judges
Tlhotlhalemaje
Legal Topics
Unfair Labour Practice, Performance Bonus Dispute, Interpretation of Policy, Review of Arbitration Award, Discretionary Benefits
Labour Law Civil Procedure Unfair Labour Practice Performance Bonus Dispute Interpretation of Policy Review of Arbitration Award Discretionary Benefits

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA)

Applicant

Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration

Respondent

Commissioner Dheliwe Mavuma N.O

Respondent

NEHAWU obo Members

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Judgment on Opposed Review Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether ICASA committed an unfair labour practice by failing to pay performance and merit bonuses for the 2019/2020 financial year.
  2. 2 What was the correct performance target set for the 2019/2020 financial year under the APP and policies.
  3. 3 Whether the Commissioner’s award was reasonable and sustainable on the evidence before her.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Commissioner erred by relying solely on the 80% target stated in the foreword of the APP, without considering the full context and contents of the APP and STRAT Plan. The evidence showed that the 80% figure referred to a five-year improvement goal, not the annual target for 2019/2020. The correct target for the relevant year was 90%, which was not met. Therefore, the employees were not entitled to performance bonuses for that year. The Commissioner’s award was unreasonable and unsustainable on the evidence, warranting review and substitution. The payment of a once-off gratuity was made in accordance with the discretion provided in the policy, and the absence of...

Court Disposition

Application for review granted; arbitration award set aside and substituted.

Orders

  • The arbitration award issued by the Second Respondent under Case Number GATW12895/21 is reviewed and set aside.
  • The Commissioner’s award is substituted with an order that the failure by ICASA to pay performance bonuses for 2019/2020FY did not constitute an unfair labour practice under section 186(2)(a) of the Labour Relations Act.