Uys N.O. and Others v VKB Landbou Limited and Another , In Re; VKB Landbou Limited v Uys N.O. and Another (2180/2013) [2013] ZAFSHC 227 (5 December 2013)
The court found that the trust had consented to judgment and to the sale of its property, and that any procedural defects alleged by the applicants were eclipsed by the substantive merits of the case. The trust had no defence to the respondent's claims and had been given ample opportunity to raise issues regarding judicial supervision and adequate housing, which it expressly waived in open court. The application for leave to appeal was deemed a further attempt to delay payment and an abuse of process. The court held that there were no reasonable prospects that another court would reach a different conclusion, and that the integrity of the civil justice system required the matter to be put...
- Citation
- [2013] ZAFSHC 227
- Parties
- Applicant: Nicolaas Petrus Uys N.O.; Applicant: Stephanus Solomon Weyers N.O.; Applicant: Nicolaas Petrus Uys; Respondent: VKB Landbou Limited; Respondent: Thomas Auctioneers
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 5 December 2013
- Case Number
- 2180/2013
- Procedural Posture
- Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Dismissal of Main Application and Grant of Counter Application.
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs on the attorney and client scale.
- Judges
- Rampai
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Declaration of Executability, Consent to Judgment, Judicial Supervision of Sale, Rule 46, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicolaas Petrus Uys N.O.
Applicant
Stephanus Solomon Weyers N.O.
Applicant
Nicolaas Petrus Uys
Applicant
VKB Landbou Limited
Respondent
Thomas Auctioneers
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Following Dismissal of Main Application and Grant of Counter Application.
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicants have reasonable prospects of success on appeal against the judgment and order granted.
- 2 Whether procedural defects in the declaration of trust property as executable justify leave to appeal.
- 3 Whether the lack of judicial supervision over the sale of immovable trust property warrants appellate intervention.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the trust had consented to judgment and to the sale of its property, and that any procedural defects alleged by the applicants were eclipsed by the substantive merits of the case. The trust had no defence to the respondent's claims and had been given ample opportunity to raise issues regarding judicial supervision and adequate housing, which it expressly waived in open court. The application for leave to appeal was deemed a further attempt to delay payment and an abuse of process. The court held that there were no reasonable prospects that another court would reach a different conclusion, and that the integrity of the civil justice system required the matter to be put...
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs on the attorney and client scale.
Orders
- The application of the trust for leave to appeal is dismissed.
- The applicants are directed to pay the costs of this application on the special scale of costs as between attorney and client.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment