V d W v Road Accident Fund (55863/2015) [2015] ZAGPPHC 1001 (2 December 2015)

V d W v Road Accident Fund (55863/2015) [2015] ZAGPPHC 1001 (2 December 2015)

The court found that the deceased had, by his conduct and intention to adopt, assumed responsibility for the maintenance of Allan and Karen, minor children from the plaintiff's previous marriage. The biological father had abdicated his responsibilities, and the deceased provided for all the children's needs. The right to maintenance in these circumstances is worthy of legal protection. The defendant failed to dispute the expert actuarial reports in time and did not present any evidence to counter the plaintiff's case. The court ordered the defendant to pay 70% of the calculated loss of support for Allan and Karen, reflecting the absence of contribution from the biological father. Punitive...

Citation
[2015] ZAGPPHC 1001
Parties
Plaintiff: E. J. T. V. D. W.; Defendant: Road Accident Fund
Court
North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
Jurisdiction
South Africa
Judgment Date
2 December 2015
Case Number
55863/2015
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Final Judgment
Outcome
The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff, on behalf of A. S. and K. S., specified amounts for loss of support. No punitive costs are awarded; costs remain as previously stipulated.
Judges
Tlhapi
Legal Topics
Loss of Support, Maintenance of Minor Children, Quantum of Damages, Duty of Support, Adoption Intent
Delict Civil Procedure Loss of Support Maintenance of Minor Children Quantum of Damages Duty of Support Adoption Intent

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 4 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

E. J. T. V. D. W.

Plaintiff

Road Accident Fund

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Trial / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the deceased had assumed a legal duty to support the minor children Allan and Karen from a previous marriage.
  2. 2 Whether the defendant is liable for loss of support to the minor children not biologically related to the deceased.
  3. 3 How quantum of damages for loss of support should be calculated in the circumstances.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the deceased had, by his conduct and intention to adopt, assumed responsibility for the maintenance of Allan and Karen, minor children from the plaintiff's previous marriage. The biological father had abdicated his responsibilities, and the deceased provided for all the children's needs. The right to maintenance in these circumstances is worthy of legal protection. The defendant failed to dispute the expert actuarial reports in time and did not present any evidence to counter the plaintiff's case. The court ordered the defendant to pay 70% of the calculated loss of support for Allan and Karen, reflecting the absence of contribution from the biological father. Punitive...

Court Disposition

The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff, on behalf of A. S. and K. S., specified amounts for loss of support. No punitive costs are awarded; costs remain as previously stipulated.

Orders

  • The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff on behalf of A. S. an amount of R185,500.00 within 14 days by electronic transfer to the trust account of the plaintiff's attorneys.
  • The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff on behalf of K. S. an amount of R268,520.00 within 14 days by electronic transfer to the trust account of the plaintiff's attorneys.