Van Den Berg v Member of the Executive Council for the Department of Health: North West Province (1098/2018) [2024] ZANWHC 164 (7 June 2024)
The court found that the plaintiff suffered significant pain, permanent impairment, and loss of earnings due to the negligent hip replacement surgery performed by the defendant's agents. The expert evidence established the need for future revision surgery, ongoing psychological and occupational therapy, and justified the claimed expenses. The parties agreed on the quantum for loss of earnings, general damages, and future medical expenses, which the court found fair and reasonable. The court rejected the plaintiff's argument for costs on scale C, finding the matter not unusually complex, and awarded costs on scale B. The defendant was ordered to pay the agreed damages and costs, with...
- Citation
- [2024] ZANWHC 164
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Van Den Berg Raphael Vivian; Defendant: Member of the Executive Council for the Department of Health: North West Province
- Court
- North West High Court, Mafikeng
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 7 June 2024
- Case Number
- 1098/2018
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Trial / Quantum Determination After Liability Established
- Outcome
- Plaintiff's claim for damages is upheld; defendant ordered to pay agreed quantum and costs.
- Judges
- J T Djaje
- Legal Topics
- Medical Negligence, Quantum of Damages, Loss of Earnings, General Damages, Expert Evidence, Costs Award
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Van Den Berg Raphael Vivian
Plaintiff
Member of the Executive Council for the Department of Health: North West Province
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Trial / Quantum Determination After Liability Established
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the quantum of damages claimed by the plaintiff for medical negligence is fair and reasonable.
- 2 Whether the plaintiff is entitled to compensation for loss of earnings, general damages, and future medical expenses.
- 3 Whether the costs should be awarded on scale B or C.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff suffered significant pain, permanent impairment, and loss of earnings due to the negligent hip replacement surgery performed by the defendant's agents. The expert evidence established the need for future revision surgery, ongoing psychological and occupational therapy, and justified the claimed expenses. The parties agreed on the quantum for loss of earnings, general damages, and future medical expenses, which the court found fair and reasonable. The court rejected the plaintiff's argument for costs on scale C, finding the matter not unusually complex, and awarded costs on scale B. The defendant was ordered to pay the agreed damages and costs, with...
Court Disposition
Plaintiff's claim for damages is upheld; defendant ordered to pay agreed quantum and costs.
Orders
- The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff R2,865,078.00 in full and final settlement within 30 days, failing which interest shall accrue from 31 days after the order until payment.
- The defendant shall pay the plaintiff's taxed or agreed party and party costs on the High Court scale B, including specified expert and counsel costs, as detailed in the order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment