Van Den Heever N.O and Another v Merchant Commercial Finance 1 (Pty) Ltd t/a Merchant Factors and Another (7595/2024) [2025] ZAWCHC 317 (29 July 2025)
The court held that sections 348 and 341(2) of the Companies Act 1973 apply to winding-up orders granted under section 130(5)(c) of the Companies Act 2008. The deeming provision in section 348 operates to fix the commencement of winding-up at the date of presentation of the application, regardless of whether the application is brought under the 1973 or 2008 Act. The payments made by JPK to Merchant after the presentation of the winding-up application are rendered void by the retrospective effect of section 341(2), as they undermine the concursus creditorum and the rights of other creditors. The court rejected Merchant's argument that the provisions only apply from the date the business...
- Citation
- [2025] ZAWCHC 317
- Parties
- Applicant: Theodor Wilhelm Van Den Heever N.O; Applicant: Mareda Rita Bennighoff N.O.; Respondent: Merchant Commercial Finance 1 (Pty) Ltd t/a Merchant Factors; Respondent: The Master of the High Court, Johannesburg
- Court
- Western Cape High Court, Cape Town
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 29 July 2025
- Case Number
- 7595/2024
- Procedural Posture
- Winding Up Application / Final Judgment on Main Application and Counter Application
- Outcome
- Application granted; payments declared void; counter-application dismissed.
- Judges
- Mangcu-Lockwood
- Legal Topics
- Winding Up of Companies, Void Dispositions, Concursus Creditorum, Business Rescue Conversion, Companies Act 1973, Companies Act 2008
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Theodor Wilhelm Van Den Heever N.O
Applicant
Mareda Rita Bennighoff N.O.
Applicant
Merchant Commercial Finance 1 (Pty) Ltd t/a Merchant Factors
Respondent
The Master of the High Court, Johannesburg
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Winding Up Application / Final Judgment on Main Application and Counter Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Does section 348, read with section 341(2) of the Companies Act 61 of 1973, apply to a liquidation order obtained under section 130(5)(c) of the Companies Act 71 of 2008?
- 2 Are payments made by the company to Merchant after the presentation of the winding-up application void under section 341(2)?
- 3 Should the court exercise its discretion to validate the payments made to Merchant?
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that sections 348 and 341(2) of the Companies Act 1973 apply to winding-up orders granted under section 130(5)(c) of the Companies Act 2008. The deeming provision in section 348 operates to fix the commencement of winding-up at the date of presentation of the application, regardless of whether the application is brought under the 1973 or 2008 Act. The payments made by JPK to Merchant after the presentation of the winding-up application are rendered void by the retrospective effect of section 341(2), as they undermine the concursus creditorum and the rights of other creditors. The court rejected Merchant's argument that the provisions only apply from the date the business...
Court Disposition
Application granted; payments declared void; counter-application dismissed.
Orders
- The payments made by JP Kruger Rand Deals (Pty) Ltd (in liquidation) during the period 16 March 2017 to 17 June 2022 in the total amount of R22,452,067.10 are declared void in terms of Section 341(2) of the Companies Act 61 of 1973.
- The first respondent is ordered to pay to the applicants, in their capacity as liquidators of JPK, the sum of R22,452,067.10.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment