Van der Bijl and Another v Featherbrooke Estate Home Owners' Association (NPC) and Another; In Re: Featherbrooke Estate Home Owners' Association (NPC) v Van der Bijl (12360/2017) [2018] ZAGPJHC 544; 2019 (1) SA 642 (GJ) (23 August 2018)
The court held that the particulars of claim do not disclose a cause of action against the Association for wrongfulness, as there is no legal duty established for the Association to protect residents from criminal harm. The mere employment of a security provider does not transfer the provider's duty to the employer unless such a duty is contractually or otherwise independently established. The Association, as a collective of homeowners, is not presumptively liable in delict for security breaches absent a specific undertaking. The infringement of constitutional rights, while grave, does not create a direct cause of action against the Association in the absence of such a duty. The common...
- Citation
- [2018] ZAGPJHC 544
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Lobbertus Jacobus van der Bijl; Plaintiff: Zena Maria Catherina van der Bijl; Defendant: Featherbrooke Estate Home Owners' Association (NPC); Defendant: Fidelity Security Services (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 23 August 2018
- Case Number
- 12360/2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Procedure / Exception to Particulars of Claim
- Outcome
- Exception upheld; particulars of claim do not disclose a cause of action against the Association.
- Judges
- Unterhalter
- Legal Topics
- Aquilian Liability, Wrongfulness, Duty of Care, Constitutional Damages, Development of Common Law, Bodily Integrity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lobbertus Jacobus van der Bijl
Plaintiff
Zena Maria Catherina van der Bijl
Plaintiff
Featherbrooke Estate Home Owners' Association (NPC)
Defendant
Fidelity Security Services (Pty) Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Procedure / Exception to Particulars of Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Association owed a legal duty to protect the plaintiffs from harm caused by third-party criminal conduct.
- 2 Whether the particulars of claim disclose wrongfulness sufficient for Aquilian liability against the Association.
- 3 Whether the common law should be developed to impose a duty on the Association to protect residents from criminal harm.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the particulars of claim do not disclose a cause of action against the Association for wrongfulness, as there is no legal duty established for the Association to protect residents from criminal harm. The mere employment of a security provider does not transfer the provider's duty to the employer unless such a duty is contractually or otherwise independently established. The Association, as a collective of homeowners, is not presumptively liable in delict for security breaches absent a specific undertaking. The infringement of constitutional rights, while grave, does not create a direct cause of action against the Association in the absence of such a duty. The common...
Court Disposition
Exception upheld; particulars of claim do not disclose a cause of action against the Association.
Orders
- The exception is upheld.
- The respondent is ordered to pay the costs, including the costs of two counsel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment