Van Der Molen v South African Civil Aviation Authority (57741/2021 ; 57742/2021) [2023] ZAGPJHC 988 (5 September 2023)
The court held that exceptions based on non-compliance with the Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act are not properly raised by way of exception, as the Act provides for condonation and waiver, and such procedural points must be pleaded by way of special plea. The statutory exclusion of liability under section 99 of the Civil Aviation Act applies only to acts done in good faith; since the plaintiffs allege bad faith, the exception fails. Regarding the duty of care, the court found that the pleaded facts are sufficient to establish a legally plausible cause of action, and that exception proceedings are inappropriate for determining complex or novel legal...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAGPJHC 988
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Miles Van Der Molen; Plaintiff: Cemair (Pty) Ltd; Defendant: South African Civil Aviation Authority; Defendant: Simphiwe Salela
- Court
- South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 5 September 2023
- Case Number
- 57741/2021 ; 57742/2021
- Procedural Posture
- Exception Application / Exception to Particulars of Claim in Two Related Actions
- Outcome
- Exceptions dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Fisher
- Legal Topics
- Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Organs of State Act, Duty of Care, Statutory Exclusion of Liability, Defamation, Aquilian Action, Administrative Decision Review
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Miles Van Der Molen
Plaintiff
Cemair (Pty) Ltd
Plaintiff
South African Civil Aviation Authority
Defendant
Simphiwe Salela
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Exception Application / Exception to Particulars of Claim in Two Related Actions
Legal Issues
- 1 Is the exception process competent to raise lack of compliance with the Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act?
- 2 Is the liability of the second defendant excluded under section 99 of the Civil Aviation Act?
- 3 Does the duty of care relied on by the plaintiffs in the Cemair action establish a cause of action?
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that exceptions based on non-compliance with the Institution of Legal Proceedings Against Certain Organs of State Act are not properly raised by way of exception, as the Act provides for condonation and waiver, and such procedural points must be pleaded by way of special plea. The statutory exclusion of liability under section 99 of the Civil Aviation Act applies only to acts done in good faith; since the plaintiffs allege bad faith, the exception fails. Regarding the duty of care, the court found that the pleaded facts are sufficient to establish a legally plausible cause of action, and that exception proceedings are inappropriate for determining complex or novel legal...
Court Disposition
Exceptions dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The exceptions are dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment