Van Der Velde v Business & Design Software (Pty) Ltd and Another (JS371/03) [2006] ZALC 49; [2006] 10 BLLR 1004 (LC); (2006) 27 ILJ 1738 (LC) (31 March 2006)
The court found that the applicant's dismissal was causally linked to the transfer of the business from BDS to NGN. The evidence showed that the applicant was dismissed less than a week before the transfer was completed, in circumstances where the new employer was preparing to assume control. The respondents failed to establish that the dismissal was for operational requirements unrelated to the transfer. The timing, contractual arrangements, and the applicant's inclusion in the transfer schedule indicated that the dismissal was effected to avoid obligations under section 197. The court held that the dismissal was automatically unfair under section 187(1)(g) of the LRA. The applicant was...
- Citation
- [2006] ZALC 49
- Parties
- Applicant: Eric Van Der Velde; Respondent: Business & Design Software (Pty) Limited; Respondent: National Golf Network (Pty) Ltd
- Court
- Labour Court
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 31 March 2006
- Case Number
- JS371/03
- Procedural Posture
- Labour Unfair Dismissal / Trial Judgment
- Outcome
- Applicant's dismissal was automatically unfair under section 187(1)(g) of the LRA. Compensation awarded.
- Judges
- A Van Niekerk
- Legal Topics
- Automatically Unfair Dismissal, Business Transfer, Section 197 Lra, Operational Requirements, Compensation Award
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Eric Van Der Velde
Applicant
Business & Design Software (Pty) Limited
Respondent
National Golf Network (Pty) Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Labour Unfair Dismissal / Trial Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant's dismissal was automatically unfair under section 187(1)(g) of the LRA due to the transfer of the business.
- 2 Whether the applicant was dismissed for operational requirements and, if so, whether the dismissal was procedurally and substantively fair.
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to a severance package under section 41 of the Basic Conditions of Employment Act.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's dismissal was causally linked to the transfer of the business from BDS to NGN. The evidence showed that the applicant was dismissed less than a week before the transfer was completed, in circumstances where the new employer was preparing to assume control. The respondents failed to establish that the dismissal was for operational requirements unrelated to the transfer. The timing, contractual arrangements, and the applicant's inclusion in the transfer schedule indicated that the dismissal was effected to avoid obligations under section 197. The court held that the dismissal was automatically unfair under section 187(1)(g) of the LRA. The applicant was...
Court Disposition
Applicant's dismissal was automatically unfair under section 187(1)(g) of the LRA. Compensation awarded.
Orders
- The applicant's dismissal was automatically unfair.
- The second respondent is ordered to pay the applicant the equivalent of 12 months' remuneration.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment