Van der Watt and Another v Jonker and Others (837/2010) [2011] ZASCA 140 (23 September 2011)
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that Jonker and the Agri group companies had locus standi to enforce the restraint of trade agreement, as Jonker was a party to the contract and had a protectable interest arising from the agreement and the R2 million paid for the separation of businesses. The sale of business as a going concern included goodwill, and the legal consequence is that the seller may not solicit former customers. The evidence showed that Van der Watt solicited Agri group customers in breach of the restraint. The reciprocal nature of the restraint, the consideration paid, and the commercial context rendered the ten-year period reasonable. Mrs van der Watt was also bound by the...
- Citation
- [2011] ZASCA 140
- Parties
- Appellant: Gert Jakobus van der Watt; Appellant: Martha Jacoba van der Watt; Respondent: Christiaan Jacobus Jonker; Respondent: Agriwen (Edms) Bpk; Respondent: Agrigen Petroleum (Edms) Bpk; Respondent: Agrigen Diesel Bultfontein (Edms) Bpk
- Court
- Supreme Court of Appeal
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 23 September 2011
- Case Number
- 837/2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Judges
- Harms, Lewis, Ponnan, Cachalia, Majiedt
- Legal Topics
- Restraint of Trade, Sale of Business, Goodwill, Locus Standi, Contract Enforcement
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gert Jakobus van der Watt
Appellant
Martha Jacoba van der Watt
Appellant
Christiaan Jacobus Jonker
Respondent
Agriwen (Edms) Bpk
Respondent
Agrigen Petroleum (Edms) Bpk
Respondent
Agrigen Diesel Bultfontein (Edms) Bpk
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Appeal From the Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Jonker and the Agri group companies have locus standi to enforce the restraint of trade agreement.
- 2 Whether the restraint of trade agreement is enforceable against the appellants, including Mrs van der Watt.
- 3 Whether the sale of business included goodwill and the legal consequences thereof.
Ratio Decidendi
The Supreme Court of Appeal held that Jonker and the Agri group companies had locus standi to enforce the restraint of trade agreement, as Jonker was a party to the contract and had a protectable interest arising from the agreement and the R2 million paid for the separation of businesses. The sale of business as a going concern included goodwill, and the legal consequence is that the seller may not solicit former customers. The evidence showed that Van der Watt solicited Agri group customers in breach of the restraint. The reciprocal nature of the restraint, the consideration paid, and the commercial context rendered the ten-year period reasonable. Mrs van der Watt was also bound by the...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- The appeal is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment