Van Graan N.O and Others v Waisman and Others (2509/2022) [2023] ZAECMKHC 27 (21 February 2023)
The court found that the ongoing enmity between Mrs van Graan and Mrs Waisman had rendered the trusts dysfunctional and imperilled their assets. The evidence established that Mrs van Graan had, at minimum, neglected her fiduciary duties as trustee, justifying her removal under section 20(1) of the Trust Property Control Act. The court rejected the argument that only one independent trustee could be appointed, finding the trust deed permitted multiple independent trustees and that such appointments were necessary to restore functionality and prevent vindictive decision-making. The court struck out portions of Mrs Dickie's affidavit as hearsay and irrelevant, and ordered costs to be borne...
- Citation
- [2023] ZAECMKHC 27
- Parties
- Applicant: Jennifer Elizabeth van Graan N.O.; Respondent: Marilyn Elizabeth Waisman; Respondent: Carolyn Anne Johnson; Respondent: Sandra Lee Bosch; Respondent: Bernice Rosslyn Dickie; Respondent: Mark Alistair Bradley; Respondent: Gabrielle Ann Johnson; Respondent: Ryan Richard Johnson; Respondent: Kaylie-Ann Bosch; Respondent: Devan Stow Bosch; Respondent: Ross Douglas Dickie; Respondent: Justin Dylan Dickie; Respondent: Jennifer Elizabeth van Graan N.O.; Respondent: Master of the High Court
- Court
- Eastern Cape High Court, Makhanda
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 21 February 2023
- Case Number
- 2509/2022
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Application / Judgment Delivered After Opposed Application and Counter Application
- Outcome
- Application and counter-application partially granted. Mrs van Graan removed as trustee; new trustees appointed; costs to be borne by the trust.
- Judges
- JE Smith
- Legal Topics
- Trustee Removal, Fiduciary Duties, Family Trusts, Trust Property Control Act, Appointment of Trustees, Costs Orders
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Jennifer Elizabeth van Graan N.O.
Applicant
Marilyn Elizabeth Waisman
Respondent
Carolyn Anne Johnson
Respondent
Sandra Lee Bosch
Respondent
Bernice Rosslyn Dickie
Respondent
Mark Alistair Bradley
Respondent
Gabrielle Ann Johnson
Respondent
Ryan Richard Johnson
Respondent
Kaylie-Ann Bosch
Respondent
Devan Stow Bosch
Respondent
Ross Douglas Dickie
Respondent
Justin Dylan Dickie
Respondent
Jennifer Elizabeth van Graan N.O.
Respondent
Master of the High Court
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Urgent Application / Judgment Delivered After Opposed Application and Counter Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the ongoing enmity between trustees justifies their removal from office.
- 2 Whether the appointment of independent trustees is necessary to restore the proper functioning of the trusts.
- 3 Whether the conduct of Mrs van Graan constituted a breach of fiduciary duties as trustee.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the ongoing enmity between Mrs van Graan and Mrs Waisman had rendered the trusts dysfunctional and imperilled their assets. The evidence established that Mrs van Graan had, at minimum, neglected her fiduciary duties as trustee, justifying her removal under section 20(1) of the Trust Property Control Act. The court rejected the argument that only one independent trustee could be appointed, finding the trust deed permitted multiple independent trustees and that such appointments were necessary to restore functionality and prevent vindictive decision-making. The court struck out portions of Mrs Dickie's affidavit as hearsay and irrelevant, and ordered costs to be borne...
Court Disposition
Application and counter-application partially granted. Mrs van Graan removed as trustee; new trustees appointed; costs to be borne by the trust.
Orders
- Those portions of the Fourth Respondent’s answering affidavit mentioned in the First Respondent’s application to strike out are struck out.
- Jennifer van Graan is removed from office as trustee of the Godfrey van Graan Family Trust and the Gowan Hill Trust with immediate effect.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment