Van Loggerenberg and Another v Prigge and Others (91711/2016) [2017] ZAGPPHC 1213 (6 December 2017)
The court found that the 2016 will did not comply with the mandatory formalities of section 2(1) of the Wills Act, as the deceased did not sign the will in the presence of two witnesses and the witnesses did not attest and sign in the presence of the deceased and each other. The respondents' counter application, seeking to have the 2016 will declared valid under section 2(3), failed because the author of the will was unknown and there was no evidence that the deceased personally drafted or typed the document. The prevailing legal principles require personal drafting or execution by the deceased for section 2(3) to apply. The court exercised its discretion to allow the late filing of the...
- Citation
- [2017] ZAGPPHC 1213
- Parties
- Applicant: Johannes Jurgens van Loggerenberg; Applicant: Hybrecht Johanna van Loggerenberg; Respondent: CH Prigge; Respondent: Estate Late Maria Petronella Fredrika Roets; Respondent: Wessels Cronje; Respondent: Mariana Harris; Respondent: Pieter Uys; Respondent: Amalia Uys; Respondent: Karen van Niekerk; Respondent: Master of the High Court, Pretoria
- Court
- North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 6 December 2017
- Case Number
- 91711/2016
- Procedural Posture
- Review Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- The 2016 will of Maria Petronella Fredrika Roets is declared null and void. The respondents' counter application is dismissed with costs. Costs of the main application are to be costs in the administration of the estate.
- Judges
- Janse van Nieuwenhuizen
- Legal Topics
- Wills Act Formalities, Testamentary Intention, Counter Application Procedure
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Johannes Jurgens van Loggerenberg
Applicant
Hybrecht Johanna van Loggerenberg
Applicant
CH Prigge
Respondent
Estate Late Maria Petronella Fredrika Roets
Respondent
Wessels Cronje
Respondent
Mariana Harris
Respondent
Pieter Uys
Respondent
Amalia Uys
Respondent
Karen van Niekerk
Respondent
Master of the High Court, Pretoria
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the 2016 will of the deceased complies with the formalities prescribed by section 2(1) of the Wills Act, 7 of 1953.
- 2 Whether the 2016 will can be declared valid under section 2(3) of the Wills Act despite non-compliance with formalities.
- 3 Whether the respondents are entitled to relief in the absence of a conditional counterclaim.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the 2016 will did not comply with the mandatory formalities of section 2(1) of the Wills Act, as the deceased did not sign the will in the presence of two witnesses and the witnesses did not attest and sign in the presence of the deceased and each other. The respondents' counter application, seeking to have the 2016 will declared valid under section 2(3), failed because the author of the will was unknown and there was no evidence that the deceased personally drafted or typed the document. The prevailing legal principles require personal drafting or execution by the deceased for section 2(3) to apply. The court exercised its discretion to allow the late filing of the...
Court Disposition
The 2016 will of Maria Petronella Fredrika Roets is declared null and void. The respondents' counter application is dismissed with costs. Costs of the main application are to be costs in the administration of the estate.
Orders
- The Last Will and Testament of Maria Petronella Fredrika Roets dated 26 March 2016 is declared null and void.
- The counter application is dismissed with costs.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment