Van Niekerk v Provinsiale Kommissaris Korrektiewe Dienste: Vrystaat en 'n Ander (1190/2003) [2004] ZAFSHC 56 (10 June 2004)
The court held that section 68 of the Correctional Services Act does not preclude the granting of further remission to a prisoner who has previously received less than the maximum two years. The interpretation advanced by the respondents would lead to absurd results, such as denying further remission to a prisoner who subsequently renders highly meritorious service. The legislative intent is to cap the total special remission at two years, not to restrict it to a single grant. Therefore, the applicant may be entitled to further remission, subject to the statutory maximum, and the respondents' point of law fails.
- Citation
- [2004] ZAFSHC 56
- Parties
- Applicant: Gideon Joubert van Niekerk; Respondent: Die Provinsiale Kommissaris Korrektiewe Dienste: Vrystaat; Respondent: Die Minister van Korrektiewe Dienste
- Court
- Free State High Court, Bloemfontein
- Jurisdiction
- South Africa
- Judgment Date
- 10 June 2004
- Case Number
- 1190/2003
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Application / Hearing on Point of Law Under Rule 33(4); Interlocutory Order
- Outcome
- The respondents' point of law is dismissed. The matter is postponed sine die to give effect to the previous court order dated 12 June 2003.
- Judges
- S.P.B. Hancke
- Legal Topics
- Remission of Sentence, Interpretation of Statutes, Special Remission, Correctional Services Act, Judicial Discretion
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Gideon Joubert van Niekerk
Applicant
Die Provinsiale Kommissaris Korrektiewe Dienste: Vrystaat
Respondent
Die Minister van Korrektiewe Dienste
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Hearing on Point of Law Under Rule 33(4); Interlocutory Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to further remission of sentence under section 68 of the Correctional Services Act.
- 2 Whether the Commissioner may grant multiple remissions provided the total does not exceed two years.
- 3 Whether an agreement or promise for remission was made between the applicant and the respondents.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that section 68 of the Correctional Services Act does not preclude the granting of further remission to a prisoner who has previously received less than the maximum two years. The interpretation advanced by the respondents would lead to absurd results, such as denying further remission to a prisoner who subsequently renders highly meritorious service. The legislative intent is to cap the total special remission at two years, not to restrict it to a single grant. Therefore, the applicant may be entitled to further remission, subject to the statutory maximum, and the respondents' point of law fails.
Court Disposition
The respondents' point of law is dismissed. The matter is postponed sine die to give effect to the previous court order dated 12 June 2003.
Orders
- The respondents' point of law is dismissed.
- The matter is postponed sine die for execution of the court order dated 12 June 2003.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment